Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
A friend told me I needed to get my /boot somewhere in the 1st 1024 cylinders of my HD to be able to dual-boot Linux and XP. Without Part. Magic, it took me a year and a day to move the XP partition (which is in NTFS format, so can't move it w/ freeware). But I got it done.
Now I can't boot up XP (or Linux, another post, another time), and I know it's because XP went from being hda1 to hda4.
After reading a bunch of posts, I'm wondering: Did I even need to bother putting /boot in the first 1024 cylinders? So many people have /boot all the way back at hda6 or 7 that I'm wondering if the GRUB install to the MBR is good enough to do the job.
Clue me in. If XP wants to be a big baby about it and just HAS to be hda1, then I'll just reformat the whole stinkin' drive and start from square 1 (assuming I can install XP from my Dell XP re-installation CD).
Yeah, when I first went through the RH9 install and had my drive as:
hda1 39 MB BIOS/MBR
hda2 23 GB Win XP
----- 15 GB Free space
I tried to just install RH9 to the free space. But RH freaked out and gave me a prompt telling me something about disk geometry. So I figured my friend was right and went ahead with the crazy partitioning.
RH9 just must be living in the past re: /boot and the 1024 rule. Guess they keep it for older machines, but they should at least mention something.
It was a limitation of much older BIOSes, and also a limitation in early (pre 21.4) versions of lilo, which did not support lba32 mode. For some reason, many people still think it's an issue, but it itsn't. BTW- Grub never had this limitatation.
As for the above-mentioned experience with Redhat 9 and disk geomentry, that's almost certainly not a function of the 1024 cylinder limit, even if it is geometry-related in general.
You might be able to get XP to boot from hda4, some versions of Windows are less picky about where they live than others.
What are you currently using as your bootloader? Post the contents of the bootloader's configuration file.