LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2005, 10:52 PM   #1
New2MDK
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Please tell me why.............?


I think I finally got things the way I wanted in Mandrake 10.1. After I ran easy_urpmi, I tried to run urpmi --auto-select (is that even necessary?) and got this:

[root@ilegheri gian]# urpmi --auto-select
To satisfy dependencies, the following 2 packages are going to be installed (3 MB):
perl-URPM-1.03-2.1.101mdk.i586
urpmi-4.5-29.1.101mdk.noarch
Is this OK? (Y/n) y

The following packages have bad signatures:
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/perl-URPM-1.03-2.1.101mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#22458a98 NOT OK)
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/urpmi-4.5-29.1.101mdk.noarch.rpm: Invalid signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#22458a98 NOT OK)
Do you want to continue installation ? (y/N) n


Does that mean there is no way to update those signatures? If I don't I'm sure that will come back and bite me? Or am I missing something only a Newbie would miss?


Thank you all


NEW2MDK
 
Old 02-24-2005, 11:01 PM   #2
chris318
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 122

Rep: Reputation: 19
All it means is that you can't verify the package is authentic becuase you don't have the authors pgp signatures in your database. So you would have to get GPG#22458a98 and GPG#22458a98 from a key server to authenticate the packages. Just search fro gpg key server on google. It's actually not that big a deal, you could just ignore it and it won't hurt you at all. I prefer to do md5sum on my files as authenication is easier, but Mandrake like the pgp mehtod.
 
Old 02-24-2005, 11:16 PM   #3
chris318
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 122

Rep: Reputation: 19
By the way ounce you have the key you can do a "pgp -import whatever" to put it in your database. More info can be found by "man gpg". Right now you have no keys "pgp --list-keys" will return nothing becuase you have none. There is also ways to automate the whole thing by editing some file and giving it the address of a keyserver and crap and build a keyring and on and on, but I rarely use gpg.
 
Old 02-25-2005, 02:58 AM   #4
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 74
Sometimes that happens when urpmi can't find packages on a mirror, just update your urpmi sources if every other solution doesn't work.
 
Old 02-25-2005, 11:57 AM   #5
New2MDK
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1
Posts: 13

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by reddazz
Sometimes that happens when urpmi can't find packages on a mirror, just update your urpmi sources if every other solution doesn't work.

Through here > http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/index.html it was unable to locate the two keys I need.

And reddazz, I'm not sure what you mean exactly? If you mean I run 'easy_urpmi' again I did. It told me everything already existed.

Thank you
 
Old 02-25-2005, 02:28 PM   #6
Padma
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Omaha, NE, USA
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 2007
Posts: 808

Rep: Reputation: 30
I believe he meant that you should run

"urpmi.update -all"

to update the hdlists for your repository mirrors.
 
Old 02-25-2005, 04:35 PM   #7
New2MDK
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1
Posts: 13

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
That allowed me to only update 'plf-free'. For some reason I'm still unable to do a urpmi --auto-select because the dependencies have bad signatures:

[root@ilegheri gian]# urpmi --auto-select
To satisfy dependencies, the following 2 packages are going to be installed (3 MB):
perl-URPM-1.03-2.1.101mdk.i586
urpmi-4.5-29.1.101mdk.noarch
Is this OK? (Y/n) y

The following packages have bad signatures:
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/perl-URPM-1.03-2.1.101mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#22458a98 NOT OK)
/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/urpmi-4.5-29.1.101mdk.noarch.rpm: Invalid signature (sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#22458a98 NOT OK)
Do you want to continue installation ? (y/N) n
[root@ilegheri gian]#


thank you
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration