LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-18-2007, 10:49 PM   #1
swamprat
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: New Jersey, (Which Exit LOL), USA
Distribution: Centos 6.7 Under VMware in Win7
Posts: 436

Rep: Reputation: 33
Question Old Computer New Suse 10.2 Performance Question


Hi all,

I currently have Suse 9.2 finally working nicely.

I have one older machine that's a P2 with an Asus m/b (tx97e).

I don't want to blow away my 9.2 system but would like to install Suse 10.2.

Question is, do you think the older machine is much to slow to do this?

Thanks.
 
Old 01-19-2007, 01:08 AM   #2
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 74
You need to post the specs of your "older" PC if you want anyone to helo you out.
 
Old 01-20-2007, 01:51 PM   #3
ciberrust
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: AUS
Distribution: CentOs, OpenSuse, Ubuntu, Leopard :D
Posts: 97

Rep: Reputation: 15
i installed 10.2 on a pcchipps integrated cpu (800) and 256 or ram with a 80gb and it wasn't "usable"
so you can get a picture, but yea you do have to post your system config
 
Old 01-20-2007, 04:47 PM   #4
2damncommon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: Debian Wheezy
Posts: 2,870

Rep: Reputation: 87
I was able to run Suse 9.1 on a 500MHz Celeron with 256MB RAM. Okay for surfing the internet but too slow to use mplayer unless I booted into ICE or blackbox.
A lighter desktop can help when using older hardware. YAST is a terrible resource hog and switching to a lighter distro can help if you either want or need to keep using that older hardware.
The bottom line is how it works for you.
 
Old 01-21-2007, 12:16 AM   #5
slybob
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Brighton - UK
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.06
Posts: 34

Rep: Reputation: 15
Suse vs lighter distro's

I had suse 10.1 installed on my 1.8ghz celeron with 512mb of ram and found it clunky and slow. I think its rather resource hungry. Dont get me started with the package manager. I think since novelle got hold its gone down the pan.

I have been using kubuntu on my desktop and xubunto on my 500mhz/128mb dell laptop.

Both run a dream and I love apt-get!

slybob
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Gumstix, Inc. Announces the netstix(TM) 400xm-cf Computer Doubling the Performance of the netstix Computers LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-23-2006 03:54 PM
Desktop Computer Spec and Performance bar soulxcavtor Linux - Software 2 05-30-2006 10:42 PM
Realplayer slow computer performance Kirmonkey Linux - Software 1 05-25-2006 09:02 PM
computer performance plunge after install yocompia Linux - Newbie 11 04-11-2003 05:27 PM
Performance question Sean1973 Linux - General 3 01-20-2003 04:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration