LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Newbie (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/)
-   -   no 3d acceleration with my ATI Radeon 9600 XT (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/no-3d-acceleration-with-my-ati-radeon-9600-xt-187173/)

elf-assassin 05-28-2004 10:57 PM

no 3d acceleration with my ATI Radeon 9600 XT
 
Ok i am a new to linux. I installes suse 9.0 but had support issues so i am running mandrake 10 official. I have a very good new 128 mb ati radeon video card and i can even run an open Gl screen saver properly and when i ran suse 9 it said no 3d acceleration. so i do i go about fixing this.

teedog 05-29-2004 12:55 AM

Do you have the ATI drivers installed? v3.9.0 was just released so you could try that. Here's an excellent FAQ for ATI Radeons (with some Gentoo-specific info):
http://odin.prohosting.com/wedge01/g...adeon-faq.html
It should be pretty much the same for other distro's though.

motub 05-29-2004 05:51 AM

More excellent How-Tos:

ATI Radeon Linux How-To

Driver patches - Rage3D Discussion Area

ATI Radeon Howto

Hope this helps.

elf-assassin 05-29-2004 09:48 PM

i went to the ati site but it says to download the driver for you xfree86 version and if you dont know download and run check.sh . i dled it and when i click on it nothing happens and i have the permissions set for exec. im back to running suse 9.0 now.

motub 05-30-2004 06:55 AM

You have to run it in a terminal, so you can see the output.

elf-assassin 05-31-2004 07:25 PM

ok i ran everything the way ati said to run it and when i finished with the fglrxconfig and answered all the questions i checked the fglrxinfo and it says mesa not ati...what do i do now

motub 06-01-2004 05:34 AM

Try restarting the X server (reboot, log out, CTRL-ALT-Backspace) so it uses the new settings instead of the old ones, which are still loaded into memory.

postmaik 06-01-2004 05:56 AM

After rebooting the system was everything alright then?
Just asking 'cause I had the same problem. And to fix that I had to do something else...

elf-assassin 06-01-2004 11:14 AM

ok you lost me...after i finished running fglrxconfig in the konsole what would you like me to type or do from there...sorry i new at this

motub 06-01-2004 11:22 AM

Quote:

Try restarting the X server (reboot, log out, CTRL-ALT-Backspace)
Either reboot, log out and back in, or use CTRL+Alt+Backspace to restart the X (graphical display) server. At the moment, it is using the settings that it read from before you changed the drivers. The X environment must be restarted in order to re-read the settings and use the new ones.

Rebooting will restart the X server. So will logging out. Holding down the CTRL+ALT+Backspace keys will also restart the X server, but is usually only used in case of emergencies such as a hard lockup.

postmaik 06-02-2004 02:06 AM

Yeah... one moment. In SuSE 9 I had to do the following:
Before restarting anything, try copying the XF86Config-4 by typing (as root)

cd /etc/X11
cp XF86Config-4 XF86Config

That will copy the config file and name it XF86Config. I don't know, what is wrong in SuSE, but that worked for me.
After you did this you can restart your computer so that fglrx module is restarted as well and not only the X server...

Hope you will have success...

motub 06-02-2004 03:00 AM

fglrxconfig gives you a choice as to what to name the file when you're finished configuring and you want to save. /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 is just one of 4 possiblilities that various distros use for the main XFree86 configuration file.

The original standard location was /etc/XF86Config. At some point either XFree86 or the distros decided that it would be logical to move the file into /etc/X11, so then the config might be either in /etc/XF86Config or /etc/X11/XF86Config. During the introduction of XFree86 version 4, apparently there were enough fundamental differences between that and version 3 that some distributions (which offered both versions) felt the need to distinguish between the version 3 and version 4 configuration files, so depending on which version you had installed, the file would be either XF86Config (if version 3) or XF86Config-4. This resulted in the configuration file being variously named and located under different distros: you might have

/etc/XF86Config
/etc/XF86Config-4
/etc/X11/XF86Config
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4

Now some distros are dropping the -4 part, since not so many people run older versions of XFree86, and even if they did, there's no need to distinguish the config files anymore, and some are also moving the config file back to base /etc/. Some, however, continue to go with what they feel their users are used to.

In any case, this is the likely reason that fglrxconfig gives you a choice of filenames and locations to save to; if you choose "no" when it gives you /etc/X11/XF86Config-4, it will ask if you then want to save to /etc/X11/XF86Config; if you say "no" to that, it will ask you if you want to save to /etc/XF86Config instead, and if you say "no" to that, it will ask you to type in a path and filename that you want to save to.

So while there's nothing wrong with copying the final configured file to the correct location, I'd just like to point out that if you had looked in /etc/ and /etc/X11 in the first place, and knew the correct filename, you could have saved the file to the proper location originally without having to fix it later.

Just so you know for the future :) .

postmaik 06-02-2004 03:13 AM

Yah man,
you're so right! I'm sorry, but I wanted to help elf-assassin with feeling what he did and telling him what to do in the next step as I did until it worked for me. Fixing it later was easier to explain because it's faster to rerun fglrxconfig.
But thanks for the story...
Hopefully it helped to fix the problem.

elf-assassin 06-03-2004 11:34 AM

OK guys nothing is working...i reran the fglrxconfig and when it finished i logged out then back in and it still saying mesa..I even tryed it again and did the copy thing postmaik said...nothing still mesa...This is driving me nuts i have a real nice card that i can use.. I like linux alot so i dont wanna have to go back to a dual boot with windows just so i can play games...thers gotta be a way to fix this

motub 06-03-2004 01:55 PM

How did you install the fglrx drivers? Have you followed any of the HOW-TO's linked above? The Mesa drivers should have been overwritten by the ATI drivers. The fact that they weren't may be a problem-- but it may also not be true. I seem to have heard reports of fglrxinfo reporting Mesa incorrectly under certain circumstances, but offhand I don't remember what those circumstances are, sorry :( .

Could you post:

1. the output of dmesg (please reboot beforehand; we want to know if the fglrx module is even loading at startup);

2. the output of lsmod |grep fglrx after you have booted, which will tell us if the module is currently loaded;

3. the contents of the XFree86 configuration file you are using... and is this the only one you have? It may be that you've configured a file that is not being used, as per my post above;

That ought to be enough to start the deeper search as to the cause of this problem.... be glad I don't know more about SuSE internals, or I'd ask for a couple of other config files as well ;) .


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 AM.