LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Linux Power User Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-08-2004, 04:52 PM   #1
dondon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: winnipeg
Distribution: fedora9 core1
Posts: 23

Rep: Reputation: 15
newer distro better???


ok, i had rh7.2 installed. only complaints were i had to go to root to access HDDs. & my "scroll" mouse didnt scroll.
I went to Mandrake 9.2, thinking newer is better, especially from a dist as old as 7.2.
WRONG!
WITH MDK9.2 i got no sound, noHDD, no cd nodvd, but HURRAY, My scroll mouse scrolls now. Whats up with that?
 
Old 01-08-2004, 05:07 PM   #2
DrOzz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,185

Rep: Reputation: 59
different distros have different support for different things ...
and thats about all i can say about it...
if you want actual help, start specify the hardware, the error messages, and what you tried if anything...
 
Old 01-08-2004, 05:15 PM   #3
TheOneAndOnlySM
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Posts: 987

Rep: Reputation: 30
well, if rh 7.2 was working for you, then you can ask for help on how to get scrolling working from this forum; you could have upgraded specific packages; or you could have just tried redhat 9.0

typically, a new distro of the same brand will have new features and new support for hardware and such, but the term "better" is a very ambiguous term

for me, newer distros have always been better (however i never tried mandrake 9.2 after things that i've heard about it) but if you don't like the idea of extra unnecessary software when an older distro is working, then new distros may not be "better"

however, like Drozz stated, different distros do things their own ways; so you can't really compare mandrake 9.2 (which has given many people problems) with redhat 7.2; however i do understand the want to upgrade from rh7.2, with support gone and such

try rh9.0 or even fedora core 1
 
Old 01-08-2004, 05:29 PM   #4
h/w
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: New York, NY
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 1,286

Rep: Reputation: 46
i see the reason why there is only debian stable, testing and unstable; instead of debain 1..10.
3 has been around for a long time now.

rh8.0 is definitely better than 9.0 not tried redhat10 aka fedora.
feel no need to move from debian now.
 
Old 01-08-2004, 05:32 PM   #5
drknow
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Distribution: Shrike (RH9)
Posts: 73

Rep: Reputation: 15
well, usually newer versions of the same distro are better. Its really just a matter of configuring most of your devices.
 
Old 01-08-2004, 06:10 PM   #6
h/w
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: New York, NY
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 1,286

Rep: Reputation: 46
forget i said anything.
 
Old 01-08-2004, 06:23 PM   #7
320mb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pikes peak
Distribution: Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,577

Rep: Reputation: 48
Quote:
Originally posted by h/w
forget i said anything.
LMAO:

Newer is not always better, I like Slack 9.0 better than 9.1
KDE and the X server seem more Crisp, and quicker to Render graphics.
I do alot of Gimping!!! <<---hey a new catch phrase...??!!??
Maybe it's just the 2.4.20 kernel is more stable than more recent updates.
 
Old 01-08-2004, 06:42 PM   #8
h/w
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: New York, NY
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 1,286

Rep: Reputation: 46
lol, ok...what i first said and edited to say "forget i said anything" was that:
if that were the case, then winME is better than 98; and XP is better than 2K (something i'm sure many will disagree, but not me).

i edited it because he used "usually". so ...
and i pretty much saw the same thing as you did on your slack, as i did when i tried rh9.0 after rh8.0.
and im sure it had nothing to do with X and it's libs.
same settings, same kernel; and even with diff settings and diff kernel.


Last edited by h/w; 01-08-2004 at 06:43 PM.
 
Old 01-08-2004, 06:54 PM   #9
drknow
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Distribution: Shrike (RH9)
Posts: 73

Rep: Reputation: 15
Yea, usually was the key word there....I should have underlined. My bad
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which one is newer? mikeymorgan Debian 6 03-29-2005 09:34 PM
Newer OS for the SG10 dayala Linux - Newbie 0 11-02-2004 10:04 AM
Newer KDM and KControl r_jensen11 Linux - Software 2 03-02-2004 01:51 PM
newer 2 kernel chris_law Linux - Software 1 01-13-2004 10:11 AM
scp newer/better radnix Linux - Networking 0 10-25-2002 07:27 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration