Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
02-13-2010, 02:27 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Rep:
|
Newbies' problems with Ubuntu 7.04
First a bit of background:
I had an experience with Linux some 12 years ago, back then no music/video applications were available, so I switched back to Windows.
Many months ago I followed the advice of a colleague of mine and installed Ubuntu 7.04 (the latest at the time). Of course, the installation went wrong (it hanged up). The FAQ and the forum was filled up with answers like be sure to burn your CDs at 8x or less. The solution was only one and posted by someone that had the same problem, the installation routine forgot to set up a swap partition and this issue caused hang up on PC with less memory (but still within the min specs). I also custom installed a bare minimum, thinking that it wouldn't be a problem to upgrade it later. The second mistake.
Now the problems:
Everything went normal, it appeared that it was a bit faster than the original XP Pro. After a while it slowed down so badly that even now when I'm typing it prints one character a second. Even the mouse moves brokenly. Firefox shutdowns from itself when it wants. The CPU runs at 100% during file transfers (!!!!!!), the System monitor itself takes 30-40% CPU (P4/1700 with 1GB RAM), only the network runs ok (speed). When I save a JPG from internet or a PDF or something, the CPU runs to 100% then there are good chances that Firefox would crash. Sometimes it needs 30 seconds or more to activate a mouse click - so a contextual menu R-click-L-click takes me 1 minute of my life.
I couldn't imagin that its file manager is so stupid: it isn't able to detect the free space on a FAT32 external system, either it's too much or it's too low. There are 2 solutions to this: 1. run dosfsck and restart the drive and 2. copy/delete in linux only. It's a nightmare to transfer files between Ubuntu 7.04 and XP.
Now I ran into another nasty problem: the USB one. It does at least one item at a time if not all three:
1. doesn't mount the HDD.
2. locks the computer (luckily the mouse works, it's USB)
3. send the USB-controller of the HDD into Nirvana : I have to power it off in order to use it again.
I've read all the info in the net concerning the USB issue: # modprobe -vr ehci_hcd # modprobe -v ehci_hcd simply doesn't work.
Are any ideas concerning the speeding up my system, the file system or the USB issues?
For now an upgrade is not possible, but when it will be then it would be a downgrade to XP Pro. I'm sick and tired of Ubuntu and if I can't sort it out then I'll revert to M$ even if I'd need to reinstall it every year.
|
|
|
|
02-13-2010, 02:45 PM
|
#2
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 14.0 // Desktop: Slackware64 14.0 // Netbook: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 6,196
|
You might have more luck with an up-to-date release, although Ubuntu 9.10 seems to be a bit rough. Try Linux Mint.
|
|
|
|
02-13-2010, 03:10 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Original Poster
Rep:
|
No, it won't be another linux of any flavours. The only reason to pick up ubuntu was because of internet, I thought that it would be safer than XP and that colleague of mine prompted me towards Ubuntu as the most user-friendly linux.
So I have to sort out this nasty USB problem, if I can not, I'll wait until my wife ends her office work then switch back to XP. I tried really hard to give linux a chance, it failed miserably ...
I simply cannot understand why an OS at its 7th major revision cannot correctly process the oldest and most known PC file system, FAT, and why it needs 100% CPU time to do a simple file copy.
PS: I am absolutely convinced that it's not a HW-related problem, my PC is an industrial grade PC - everything worked as a charm under XP Pro.
|
|
|
|
02-13-2010, 03:25 PM
|
#4
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 6,443
|
Seriously, try another distro.
Maybe you did something to it. Did you install any software on it, and how? Because Linux really isn't slow. I've never seen or heard anything like that on Linux before.
And what are that computer's specs?
Last edited by MTK358; 02-13-2010 at 03:26 PM.
|
|
|
|
02-13-2010, 03:28 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Debian Squeeze
Posts: 94
Rep:
|
Well brianL is absolutely right on this one...
Try to get version 9.04 (Jaunty) or 8.04 LTS (Long Time Support) (Hardy). Both are still supported and surely will work for you.
Of the two you might choose 8.04 if stability is your priorty and 9.04 if you prefer the newest software that still *works*.
BTW: I use 9.04, 9.10 is too rough for me (Skype is a priority for me and couldn't get that working in 9.10).
Best regards
Stardustdk
|
|
|
|
02-13-2010, 03:46 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /Earth/UK/England/Hampshire
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 262
Rep:
|
I read this and had to register. I'm still using 7.10 and it's as sweet as a nut, it walks over XP for me so I'm sad to hear that someone is getting such terrible issues. Judging by the processor mentioned (P4/1700) this is not new hardware, but my own box is only a P4/2400 with 1g ram and on top of all the floss I run I have Zoneminder, Asterisk, Postfix, Spamassassin all banging away in the background and the box has been up for over 60 days. In fact I only restarted it to add another PCI card for Zoneminder. So either 7.04 was seriously screwy, or you have something seriously up.
Can I ask, if you've come back to trying Ubuntu because it's 'more secure' for the internet - is it because you are currently having issue with XP? It crosses my mind that perhaps if that is the case there is a hardware issue going on affecting both OS's.
|
|
|
|
02-14-2010, 02:40 AM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ok, there's a Fujitsu-Siemens having a P4 of 1.7GHz and 1GB RAM. The HDD is extremely small for nowadays standards,15GB, but it runs 24/7. Every other component is integrated in the mainboard.
I did nothing to it, except surfing the inet (mail,google, some fora, photo services like flickr, youtube), my wife also works on office.
Is there any tool, like RegCleaner, that cleans the system? The Sysmanager helps not, if even starts at all when I need it. Yesterday I experienced something that I thought it was history (well Windows95), the user interface stopped working, neither the KB nor the mouse had any effect.
I assume that's the graphic interface that takes so much from the CPU. Or maybe there's something wrong with the swap.
Maybe you guys know from experience some bugs and, voluntarily or involuntarily, circumvent them, you know, pick another way of doing the same thing, like I know in XP compared to my wife (which constantly crashed W95).
However, my previous experience with linux was a positive one, except for configuring the graphic card (it was the main hurdle back then, which I did), and the system ran faster and smoother on lower PC configurations (386/486). Stability, speed and low resource needs were the key advantages of linux vs NT server. Long gone are these days, if now to run a linux you need more resources than even MS wants. I have 2 systems, one has 1GB and runs ubuntu, the other has 256MB (I don't know now for sure, it may be 512) and runs XP home, doing SAT things, including software decoding of MPEG-2. It never started its CPU fan and ran always 5°C cooler.
Now, about 8.04: I was told that I need to do a clean install (format C:  ), which is a no go unless I can however backup some links/favourites and files. I'll give a second chance if I could save my work.
Second question: no, I never had any problems with XP pro, it was a two-fold decision: I have only 1 licence of XP pro so one PC would have MS, the other one then linux. XP becomes slowly an overloaded system and one needs to reinstall it regularly (especially when one installs and deinstalls a lot, more especially various trials and so on). I thought linux would be more safe. Forgot to tell, I'm running both systems without any antivirus but through a HW firewall.
Last edited by Ghitulescu; 02-14-2010 at 02:41 AM.
|
|
|
|
02-14-2010, 04:03 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Debian Squeeze
Posts: 94
Rep:
|
IF you do a dual-boot install next, CCleaner for XP is recommended, nothing of that kind is needed in Ubuntu  .
Before you make a clean 8.04 installation, insert a knoppix CD/DVD while having a external harddrive/USB key inserted (the easy way, I have used it several times). You might even be able to backup your data with the 8.04 CD inserted, give it a try  .
That is only possible if there is nothing wrong with wth the disk. Else try to insert your XP CD and start in command-mode and use the CHKDSK command. From within Linux it is: ntfsfix /dev/sda* (typically).
IF you thereafter install 8.04 remember to use the command: sudo ufw enable. The buildin software-firewall will then be activated.
----
IF Ubuntu 8.04 takes to many ressources, check out Xubuntu 8.04 http://www.xubuntu.org/get
(XFCE desktop).
There might even soon be a Lubuntu 10.04 (LXDE) that can be used on older hardware.
Hopes this helps.
Best regards
Stardustdk
Last edited by stardustdk; 02-14-2010 at 04:04 AM.
Reason: Spelling
|
|
|
|
02-14-2010, 04:06 AM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /Earth/UK/England/Hampshire
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 262
Rep:
|
To get an idea of what is killing your system, can you post the output of the command:
Or if that flies by too fast:
Code:
top c n 1 b > topoutput
This will save the output to a text file called 'topoutput' that you can then paste here.
Just touching on your questions:
Quote:
|
Is there any tool, like RegCleaner, that cleans the system?
|
I'm not aware of one, or the need for one. There is no registry on Linux - things are far more efficient in my view with simple text configs called as needed.
Quote:
|
I assume that's the graphic interface that takes so much from the CPU. Or maybe there's something wrong with the swap.
|
Any X Desktop is going to use resources, but not to a point where the system is unusable. Gnome is pretty mature and stable and should be the default with 7.04
As for swap, the output of the top command will give this away when you post it. My P4 is currently using a tiny amount at 3080k used.
I agree there are hardware issues, but it's much better than it was. I certainly find getting hardware working with Ubuntu much less of a PITA that I did with XP and Vista. Currently there is a bit of an issue with ATI cards and Ubuntu 9.10 - but then when I think back there were issues with Vista and just about everything :-)
Your small drive is no major issue, but I'm guessing you have windows on it too so I'd be interested to see the output of the 'df' command.
XP With just a hardware firewall is probably not something I would do. This is going to give no protection from the kind of exploits that get downloaded and call }out{ through that firewall - but you don't need me to tell you that.
Let's see the top and df output and see if anything jumps out.
|
|
|
|
02-14-2010, 05:02 AM
|
#10
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 6,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu
Is there any tool, like RegCleaner, that cleans the system?
|
No. Linux does not have a registry or anything of that kind.
If it is used properly Linux does not fill with junk and conflicts like Windows.
|
|
|
|
02-14-2010, 05:20 AM
|
#11
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Original Poster
Rep:
|
1. first, sorry for any missunderstandings, I know that the registry system in linux is hold in etc, RegCleaner was given as a generic term.
2. now, the system runs ok, here's the output of top
Code:
bogdan@Internet:~$ top c n 1 b
top - 12:10:45 up 1:32, 2 users, load average: 4.71, 3.91, 2.93
Tasks: 102 total, 6 running, 96 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 39.4%us, 7.8%sy, 9.6%ni, 37.5%id, 4.7%wa, 0.4%hi, 0.7%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 1027584k total, 852168k used, 175416k free, 3452k buffers
Swap: 1919756k total, 33828k used, 1885928k free, 394780k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5905 bogdan 21 0 687m 141m 11m S 42.1 14.1 14:56.69 java -Xmx512m -Xms6
16762 bogdan 25 0 173m 61m 19m R 32.5 6.2 11:56.50 ktorrent --icon=kto
4633 root 15 0 237m 34m 11m R 15.3 3.4 5:30.29 /usr/X11R6/bin/X :0
5064 bogdan 15 0 116m 37m 21m S 7.6 3.7 4:35.71 nautilus --no-defau
19573 bogdan 15 0 2312 1060 796 R 3.8 0.1 0:00.03 top c n 1 b
1 root 22 0 2908 1844 524 S 0.0 0.2 0:01.60 /sbin/init
2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/0]
3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.09 [ksoftirqd/0]
4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [watchdog/0]
5 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.03 [events/0]
6 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 [khelper]
7 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kthread]
30 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 [kblockd/0]
31 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kacpid]
32 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kacpi_notify]
95 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kseriod]
118 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:04.86 [kswapd0]
119 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/0]
1935 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksuspend_usbd]
1936 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [khubd]
1943 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.86 [ata/0]
1944 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ata_aux]
1979 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [scsi_eh_0]
1980 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.05 [scsi_eh_1]
2301 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.22 [kjournald]
2500 root 18 -4 2904 1236 356 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.55 /sbin/udevd --daemo
3379 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kpsmoused]
4060 root 18 0 1652 512 440 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 /sbin/getty 38400 t
4061 root 18 0 1648 508 440 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 /sbin/getty 38400 t
4064 root 18 0 1652 512 440 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 /sbin/getty 38400 t
4066 root 18 0 1648 508 440 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 /sbin/getty 38400 t
4067 root 18 0 1648 504 440 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 /sbin/getty 38400 t
4068 root 18 0 1648 508 440 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 /sbin/getty 38400 t
4303 root 18 0 2256 1168 656 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/acpid -c
4409 root 18 0 1704 648 536 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.07 /sbin/syslogd
4462 root 16 0 1792 524 432 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.06 /bin/dd bs 1 if /pr
4464 klog 18 0 2424 1368 400 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.11 /sbin/klogd -P /var
4485 messageb 15 0 2848 1064 736 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.24 /usr/bin/dbus-daemo
4501 haldaemo 15 0 5476 3804 2528 S 0.0 0.4 0:00.65 /usr/sbin/hald
4502 root 15 0 2880 1040 884 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 hald-runner
4508 haldaemo 15 0 2108 900 776 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.03 hald-addon-keyboard
4509 haldaemo 24 0 2108 896 776 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 hald-addon-keyboard
4516 haldaemo 25 0 2108 888 764 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 hald-addon-acpi: li
4521 haldaemo 16 0 3048 1184 1032 S 0.0 0.1 0:01.71 hald-addon-storage:
4534 root 15 0 1944 696 608 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.05 /usr/sbin/dhcdbd --
4549 root 15 0 4136 1876 1640 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/NetworkMa
4567 avahi 18 0 2672 1368 1160 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.02 avahi-daemon: runni
4568 avahi 25 0 2672 468 288 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 avahi-daemon: chroo
4581 root 25 0 3028 1144 992 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/NetworkMa
4594 root 25 0 2868 800 692 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/bin/system-too
4595 root 25 0 2716 1216 1060 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 dbus-daemon --sessi
4627 root 19 0 12216 1404 852 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/gdm
4628 root 15 0 12576 2396 1772 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.25 /usr/sbin/gdm
4698 cupsys 18 0 4816 2068 1464 S 0.0 0.2 0:06.00 /usr/sbin/cupsd
4722 root 25 0 6416 836 516 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/hpiod
4731 hplip 15 0 10060 4996 1036 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.01 python /usr/sbin/hp
4834 root 25 0 2696 1000 888 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/hcid -x -
4851 root 9 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [krfcommd]
4886 daemon 18 0 1908 420 300 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/atd
4900 root 18 0 2280 900 720 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/cron
4994 bogdan 15 0 30464 11m 8488 S 0.0 1.1 0:00.47 x-session-manager
5032 bogdan 18 0 4256 528 276 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/bin/ssh-agent
5035 bogdan 18 0 2660 628 516 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/bin/dbus-launc
5036 bogdan 15 0 2844 1040 768 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.05 /usr/bin/dbus-daemo
5038 bogdan 15 0 6580 4132 1872 S 0.0 0.4 0:05.24 /usr/lib/libgconf2-
5041 bogdan 19 0 2756 1000 868 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 /usr/bin/gnome-keyr
5043 bogdan 15 0 29284 9720 7752 S 0.0 0.9 0:02.30 /usr/lib/control-ce
5050 bogdan 18 0 1712 480 412 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 /bin/sh -c /usr/bin
5051 bogdan 15 0 4952 3320 1268 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.03 /usr/bin/esd -termi
5055 bogdan 15 0 17084 9.8m 7332 S 0.0 1.0 0:33.34 /usr/bin/metacity -
5058 bogdan 15 0 61416 16m 12m S 0.0 1.7 0:38.87 gnome-panel --sm-cl
5067 bogdan 15 0 39624 3168 2384 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.30 /usr/lib/bonobo-act
5068 bogdan 15 0 18876 4828 3684 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.10 gnome-volume-manage
5073 bogdan 15 0 8476 3416 2808 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.08 /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-
5077 bogdan 22 0 67932 9856 8196 S 0.0 1.0 0:00.28 /usr/lib/evolution/
5079 bogdan 15 0 50920 10m 9084 R 0.0 1.1 0:00.74 nm-applet --sm-disa
5080 bogdan 16 0 56464 8240 6708 S 0.0 0.8 0:08.76 gnome-cups-icon --s
5081 bogdan 15 0 50816 6096 4228 R 0.0 0.6 0:00.56 gnome-power-manager
5094 bogdan 15 0 36476 9444 7860 S 0.0 0.9 0:00.24 /usr/lib/evolution/
5103 bogdan 18 0 83716 9108 7072 S 0.0 0.9 0:00.24 /usr/lib/gnome-appl
5116 bogdan 15 0 2460 888 772 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.01 /usr/lib/nautilus-c
5118 bogdan 15 0 58300 6288 5016 S 0.0 0.6 0:00.12 /usr/lib/evolution/
5154 bogdan 17 0 52528 10m 8464 S 0.0 1.1 0:00.33 /usr/lib/gnome-appl
5169 bogdan 15 0 54096 12m 9152 S 0.0 1.2 0:00.83 /usr/lib/gnome-appl
5173 bogdan 15 0 15932 4376 3364 S 0.0 0.4 0:06.02 gnome-screensaver
7646 bogdan 15 0 49580 10m 7104 S 0.0 1.0 0:01.86 /usr/lib/notificati
16536 bogdan 15 0 303m 91m 26m S 0.0 9.1 1:35.64 /usr/lib/firefox/fi
16760 bogdan 15 0 76168 15m 10m S 0.0 1.5 0:00.77 gnome-terminal
16772 bogdan 18 0 2460 728 608 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 gnome-pty-helper
16773 bogdan 16 0 5580 3100 1444 S 0.0 0.3 0:00.31 bash
16821 bogdan 21 0 25600 5804 4268 S 0.0 0.6 0:00.09 kdeinit Running...
16827 bogdan 18 0 25440 4796 3612 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.15 dcopserver [kdeinit
16830 bogdan 15 0 25876 7136 5900 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.06 klauncher [kdeinit]
16838 bogdan 15 0 27368 9632 7884 S 0.0 0.9 0:00.81 kded [kdeinit]
16862 bogdan 15 0 29984 13m 10m S 0.0 1.3 0:00.91 kio_uiserver [kdein
16866 bogdan 15 0 25900 7088 5488 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.07 kio_file [kdeinit]
17096 bogdan 15 0 33144 11m 8840 R 0.0 1.1 0:00.54 knotify [kdeinit]
17100 bogdan 15 0 10912 5300 4044 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.31 /usr/bin/artsd -F 1
17165 bogdan 15 0 51736 7340 5680 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.11 kio_http [kdeinit]
18910 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 [pdflush]
18921 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 [pdflush]
19532 bogdan 34 19 37276 7424 5824 S 0.0 0.7 0:00.35 /usr/bin/gnome-vide
Diskfree I run constantly to have an idea of the space left. So here's its output roo:
Code:
bogdan@Internet:~$ df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 18145092 11317344 5906024 66% /
varrun 513792 96 513696 1% /var/run
varlock 513792 0 513792 0% /var/lock
procbususb 513792 84 513708 1% /proc/bus/usb
udev 513792 84 513708 1% /dev
devshm 513792 0 513792 0% /dev/shm
lrm 513792 33788 480004 7% /lib/modules/2.6.20-17-generic/volatile
A dualboot is not an option. It would be either linux or XPPro.
Now, if I'm going to change the system, I don't need something fancy (like Aero for Vista) but something that runs stable in graphic mode (no terminals) and can support a simple and efficace webbrowser, maybe a torrent client (I use ktorrent now).
Additon:
Maybe the sloweness is and the frequently crashing of firefox is due to heavily loaded webpages (like Amazon) with all this ads and popups (javscript, java applets and stuff). It hapens always on pages that are full of such items (most fora are ad supported).
Last edited by Ghitulescu; 02-14-2010 at 05:28 AM.
|
|
|
|
02-14-2010, 05:41 AM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /Earth/UK/England/Hampshire
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 262
Rep:
|
Jumping right out:
5905 bogdan 21 0 687m 141m 11m S 42.1 14.1 14:56.69 java -Xmx512m -Xms6
16762 bogdan 25 0 173m 61m 19m R 32.5 6.2 11:56.50 ktorrent --icon=kto
Top one using 42% cpu, bottom 32%.
I would ask if this is reasonably constant on the box?
From memory - and I'm hoping someone will correct me if I'm wrong - ktorrent is the KDE bit torrent client, but does 7.04 not ship with Gnome? Have you added ktorrent or other KDE parts to to a Gnome desktop at all? I'm not sure what is making use of the JVM (Java) on your box but it's hogging 42% there. I'm not sure you have running in Java, but between that and ktorrent - you are loosing a notable amount of CPU. I suspect if you kill these off you'll notice the system become more responsive. That would be my starting point.
As far as BT goes (which I've always found to slow the box down unless it is set up carefully), I use 'Transmission' which is with Gnome - or on occasions the Opera built in BT client.
Last edited by spampig; 02-14-2010 at 05:43 AM.
|
|
|
|
02-14-2010, 05:47 AM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /Earth/UK/England/Hampshire
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, Slackware
Posts: 262
Rep:
|
Just adding to this - is the Kubuntu 7.04 or Ubuntu 7.04 - there are lots of KDE processes running there I think. Was 7.04 KDE????? I'm sure the vanilla was Gnome (hence the creation of Kubuntu).
|
|
|
|
02-14-2010, 05:57 AM
|
#14
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 6,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu
1. first, sorry for any missunderstandings, I know that the registry system in linux is hold in etc, RegCleaner was given as a generic term.
2. now, the system runs ok, here's the output of top
Code:
bogdan@Internet:~$ top c n 1 b
top - 12:10:45 up 1:32, 2 users, load average: 4.71, 3.91, 2.93
Tasks: 102 total, 6 running, 96 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 39.4%us, 7.8%sy, 9.6%ni, 37.5%id, 4.7%wa, 0.4%hi, 0.7%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 1027584k total, 852168k used, 175416k free, 3452k buffers
Swap: 1919756k total, 33828k used, 1885928k free, 394780k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5905 bogdan 21 0 687m 141m 11m S 42.1 14.1 14:56.69 java -Xmx512m -Xms6
16762 bogdan 25 0 173m 61m 19m R 32.5 6.2 11:56.50 ktorrent --icon=kto
4633 root 15 0 237m 34m 11m R 15.3 3.4 5:30.29 /usr/X11R6/bin/X :0
5064 bogdan 15 0 116m 37m 21m S 7.6 3.7 4:35.71 nautilus --no-defau
|
What are you running in Java here? KTorrent and X seem to be taking more than I would expect them to, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu
Now, if I'm going to change the system, I don't need something fancy (like Aero for Vista) but something that runs stable in graphic mode (no terminals) and can support a simple and efficace webbrowser, maybe a torrent client (I use ktorrent now).
|
I'm not sure what you mean by "no terminals", but you can try using a plain window manager instead of a desktop like GNOME or KDE.
Options include FVWM, Openbox, Fluxbox, PekWM, etc...
Note that some of these don't even have a taskbar, you can use one like "tint2".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu
Additon:
Maybe the sloweness is and the frequently crashing of firefox is due to heavily loaded webpages (like Amazon) with all this ads and popups (javscript, java applets and stuff). It hapens always on pages that are full of such items (most fora are ad supported).
|
Get "AdBlock Plus". It removes annoying ads and makes pages load much faster since it doesn't have to download each ad at a time from different sites.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
02-14-2010, 06:50 AM
|
#15
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 10
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well, I'm a newbie in linux, I installed what I was suggested to install.
The ktorrent was the only client offered at the time of install, or I wasn't aware of anything else. It's awfully slow but it works well when I don't "click" it steadily.
Java VM runs right now a copy of jdownloader. It's a brand new addition, it's not the cause, the system is slow like this for months, I simply cannot change it as my wife still works onto it.
Yes, 43% is normal, often goes up to 100% and stays there. The CPU fan runs like hell, then pauses, starts again, its twin PC (less memory though) is absolutely silent even when decoding MPEG-2 (DVB-S) in software.
By no terminals I wanna say I don't want to type in commands to do things, I keep however a terminal open for df and chkfsk, just in case.
Is it as KDE or a gnome? No idea at all, it starts as a crème (light brown) colour with Nautilus, a taskbar up (like the Windows one) and another one down (with all the open windows and the trashcan). How to find what is what? From what I've seen in google it is a gnome desktop.
Yes, if I work only in office the system is ok. But this is the internet PC so it should do mainly inet jobs. Lauching Firefox would slow the system visibly, luckily there's this "recovery system" so I don't have to type in all the web adresses again when it crashes.
Thank you guys, I really appreciate your efforts. The problems that I have can be solved by having to install a new fresh system then to consider your suggestions, as I cannot update myself anymore (end of cycle).
So, by now, your suggestions would be Xubuntu 8.04 (is it LTS?), Opera as the webbrowser (I thought it is adsupported???), adblock plus, and maybe another torrent client (Transmission???) and RS/MU downloader (I started to like jdownloader). In addition it would be nice to have an office and a multimedia player.
One last question: your forum loads ads from at least 4 sites before loading the posts, would it work if I'd employ such ad-blockers?
Last edited by Ghitulescu; 02-14-2010 at 06:54 AM.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|