LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2003, 03:10 PM   #1
tarballed
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Distribution: RH, FC, FreeBSD,OpenBSD
Posts: 326

Rep: Reputation: 30
Newbie qusetion source and binary


Ok, this is something I have been meaning to ask for quite some time, but I never have.

What I was wondering is if someone call tell me the difference between a source package and a binary packet? For instance, when I sometimes download a RPM, I have the option of downloading the 'src' version of the RPM.

Also, sometimes when I download a tarball, I have the option of downloading it as source or as a binary.

Can someone explain the difference to me and why I would want one or the other?

Thank you very much.

Tarballed
 
Old 01-30-2003, 03:51 PM   #2
NSKL
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Rome, Italy ; Novi Sad, Srbija; Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Ubuntu / ITOS2008
Posts: 1,207

Rep: Reputation: 46
Binary package is already compiled, machine code, that you just need to install. RPM's DEB's and slackware's TGZ's are binary packages, pre-compiled. Source RPM's and source code tarballs contain the actual code (usually C or C++, Python, or whatever) and instructions how to make (compile) that bunch of text files into binary AKA machine code. If you have all the requirements needed for that source code to compile (if you have all necessary libraries it needs to link to), then it will compile and install.
On binary distros such as mandrake and RH stick with RPM's and in some cases you will need source RPMs. On other distros that you can tailor to your wish you should always use source code because that way you can specifu special compile-time features and you will get cleaner and faster machine code since it's compiled exactly for your hardware.
Does that help?
-NSKL
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Source or Binary? dick_onion53 Fedora 4 12-31-2004 07:04 PM
do i want the source or binary .iso? Lleb_KCir Linux - Software 2 08-05-2004 04:02 AM
Source or binary? NonSumPisces Linux - Distributions 2 06-06-2004 04:01 PM
Source vs. Binary? rhraz Linux - Newbie 4 03-03-2004 05:16 PM
Binary/Source Distro Installation Help SML Linux - Newbie 1 02-17-2004 01:32 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration