Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
alrite so first off let me give the specs
2 HDD: one 20gb and on 60gb
kk and for partitions
20 gb= C installed on it is win2k
60 gb= junk
i partitioned C: and made it 10 gb (NTFS), and made another PRIMARY partition called drive I: (fat32) ...its 10gb big lol
i have a swap partition made with partition magic 512 mb big, it doesnt show in windows explorer, prob cuz its not sopposed to but just saying
i have the ISO's as followed:
i use check sum on all of them and the numbers all match
also, i wanna use KDE (u guys think i should use something else?)
alrite so the problem!
i burned yarrow disk 1 to a cd, with nero, i used the burn ISO option k? so i burn it, its working and all in explorer so i restart computer... boot magic comes up and its like 'wat hdd u wanna boot from' 1: C:\ windows 2k or 2: I:\ ok so i click I: and since their nothing on it, its like 'hi press enter key to boot from cd' so im like *enter* and its like 'can not load from cd' or something, it doesnt see it as a boot disk! ok so i no im doing SOMETHING wrong with the buring of the iso! which files in the iso do i burn? do i need to extract anything? is fedora any good!?!?!?! so many questions argh thanks for reading this,
if i did anything wrong with the whole partition thing please tell me
p.s. where do i get all the drivers for my mother board and networking cards for linux? is it ez to install them?
p.p.s how about my cable modem? lol do i need like to set up the DHCP and gateway and crap or will it be automatic
Distribution: Lots of distros in the past, now Linux Mint
I'd avoid Fedora for the time being. Right now, it's somewhat beta, and tends to need a lot of handholding. Personally, I'm beholden to Mandrake 9.1. The newer versions (9.2 and 10 community) have some problems. Slackware's great, but only for someone with a little experience with installing Linux, and the same with debian. SuSE doesn't allow ISO downloads, which is a bummer. Most of the other stuff just isn't that well used to recommend comfortably.
For the record, I'm recommending 9.1 because 9.2 "forgot" to include kernel source code (important if you need to add an unusual driver), and 10 community is a better, but similar, version of what fedora is.
It sounds worse than it is. If you're in a hurry to use Linux, try Mandrake 9.1. If you're in a hurry to see what Linux is all about, try Knoppix (bootable cd, no commitment). If you have some patience, try mandrake 10 or a SuSE ftp download. If you have all the patience in the world, try Slackware, Debian, or see www.distrowatch.com for the full list of distros available.
I hate being negative, but there's actually a fairly good reason why things have gone a little haywire recently. First, the new kernel is out (2.6), and everybody's working on that more than anything. Second, the GUI folks have been moving along pretty well, so there's some waiting in that arena. In a similar vein, there are a lot of other major projects that are approaching major changes, so everyone is kind of waiting, just to make sure they get the best product out the door.
This happened with 2.4 (to a degree), but it also backfired on some folks when they rushed to be the first ones with the new kernel and programs. This time, everybody's a little more weary, perhaps too weary.
left click on the ISO images and click "open with nero", or "open with.." then pick nero,
and reboot, like you did, some cd-roms have trouble reading certain cd-roms (iv seen new laptops not being able to boot cd-rw, but my older laptop can, kinda sad)
and if the cd's are blank, you can left click the iso's and click "burn to cd" or something like that
dependsin on the distro if it will configure for you, linux kernel comes with drivers for you (unless your using modern chip-sets like nvida (you can dl those from there site), as for your cable modem your set, at worst case you'll have to type in "dhclient" before using the Internet (most distros do this for you)
and DHCP is not crap, it condifures all that other stuff for you (gateways, routes... eeh saves you a few extra commands)
thanks u guys! alrite well ima try burning the iso's to a rw this time so i dont have MORE frisbees to throw around -_- SciYro i didnt say DHCP is crap lol, i meant crap as in other stuff in networking and the cable modem, sorry i should have rephrased it instead of using crap heh, ok well this cd boot better work or else im trying Mandrake 9.1
I'd avoid Fedora for the time being. Right now, it's somewhat beta, and tends to need a lot of handholding.
Bull, its a lot better than mandrake. It is NOT beta, the FC2 TEST is beta, FC1 is stable and easy to use. You do not know much about FC1 if you think it is hard to use and install, it is simple to use.
And BTW, burn all isos at a slow speed, they are very bitchy