Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I had a question reguarding SuSe's Automatic Update, how reliable is this feature of this distro and what do you all think of the SuSe distro? I'm using 8.2 with Gnome, and I dunno..I'm a previous user to Gentoo, so I'm a little portage tree spoiled. I guess also my question is how stable is this distro? It seems very user friendly, even if one has no previous knowledge of the Linux OS. But uhhhhh, I just don't know ... comments?
From what I've experienced, Red Hat distros seem to be more stable. Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but alot of times, certain applications crash on startup or just refuse to start. They're not important applications like office software, just games and other like programs. Still, this does add to the overall annoyance level.
I prefer KDE to GNOME though, as I find the interface alot more visually pleasing. While SuSE 8.2 does come with quite alot of packages, in my opinion they do not provide enough. GTK+ is absent, and finding a source that will actually install correctly is almost as hard as finding an RPM of the file, which would make installing tons easier.
Of course, I need this file (and dependencies) to upgrade the archaic version of Gaim they included (v0.59.8), which leads me to my next gripe. With Red Hat 8, I was able to upgrade to the new version, directly connect, and send and recieve files to my friends who are still running Windows. I cannot do any of the above, in this case.
I mainly switched distros because RH8 didn't have much support for hardware. I had to manually configure my cable modem before it was usable, and my sound card wouldn't work at all until I tweaked my BIOS. Maybe there's better support in RH9, but until I know for sure, I may as well stick with SuSE.
I would have tried Mandrake, but nowhere I know of carries it and I'll be damned if I'm going to download all those files off of an FTP and try my hand at manually installing the entire operating system.
To put it simply, SuSE definitely is not the best distro out there. Granted its all a matter of opinion, I've never been able to "like" this distro. At best, I can tolerate it.
The only thing about thier Update service that I didnt like was if you installed non-SuSE packages-in my case,upgrading to the latest cdr-tools and XCD-Roast-it would actually downgrade the package(s) back to the version(s) that came with your copy of SuSE.
lynch
Never tried that, though I do dislike how you can't just download packages you don't have already through the YOU update. That would make things tons easier. Is anyone from the SuSE team listening?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.