LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-19-2003, 10:01 AM   #1
ToothPaste
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
New stable kernels.. safe to use?


There was an article on slashdot yesterday when the 2.6.0 kernel was released in which I noticed a lot of people pretty much saying that it's not a wise choice to use this new kernel in production environments.

The question I have is... why exactly is this a bad idea? It's already past the beta/test stages if it was deemed worthy to be an official stable release, right?

At what point do most people consider a stable kernel to be actually stable? I guess I can attribute this to the old saying, "If it's not broken, don't fix it," but that seems kind of silly considering that each kernel release is an improvement of some kind to the one before it. However, I have read about some instances where a kernel release actually broke something that worked perfectly fine in the release before (for example, something that worked in 2.4.21 that no longer works properly in 2.4.22 and 2.4.23).

The thing is, I have a few MySQL servers and I read that there were a number of changes in the new kernel that would actually improve the stability and performance of database servers. I was thinking about recompiling the new 2.6.0 kernel and using that, but if it's not stable then I'll stay away from it until, I suppose, it's "really really" stable.

Thanks in advance!
 
Old 12-19-2003, 10:17 AM   #2
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 198Reputation: 198
Its stable, they wouldn't have released it if they hadn't been deemed unstable. But you have to realize as well, your thinking of users who used and submitted bugs to the developers, etc. In all cases, not everything is caught and you could always run into problems when using any type of software, etc.

I personally haven't upgraded yet, I see no real reason to on my servers. I am however going to upgrade my desktop to test it out first, see if its worth the upgrade, etc.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debian stable or non stable 1702fp Debian 19 02-24-2005 04:54 AM
how can i upgrade my squid 2.5 stable 1 to stable 3 in RH9? debloxie Linux - Networking 0 05-12-2004 08:49 PM
how can i upgrade my squid 2.5 stable 1 to stable 3 in RH9? debloxie Linux - Networking 0 05-12-2004 11:25 AM
Installing KDE3.1.3 on stable system using the "stable" mirror at download.kde.org preben Debian 8 08-28-2003 07:02 AM
RH 8 kernels and their relation to 'stock' kernels psweetma Linux - Distributions 1 03-29-2003 10:46 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration