Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!


  Search this Thread
Old 11-04-2012, 11:12 PM   #1
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
need advice on choosing wiping scheme for bcwipe

how ya'

which wiping method is more secure when using bcwipe. Below is an excerpt of the man page

-mb German BCI/VISTR 7-pass wiping
-md U.S. DoD 5220-22M 7-pass extended character rotation wiping
-me U.S. DoE 3-pass wiping
-mf<file> read wiping scheme from file. See *notes below
-mg (default) 35-pass wiping by Peter Gutmann
-ms 7-pass wiping by Bruce Schneier
-mt 1-pass test mode: fill the start of 512-byte block with block number
-mz 1-pass zero wiping
-m N U.S. DoD 5220-22M N-pass extended character rotation wiping
Old 11-05-2012, 06:01 AM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian i686 (solaris)
Posts: 6,741

Rep: Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809Reputation: 1809
what is the goal? probably a simple 1 pass wiping is sufficient, if you have some really - really important information you may try a 3 pass wiping also.
Old 11-05-2012, 06:04 AM   #3
Registered: Oct 2012
Distribution: OpenSuSE,RHEL,Fedora,OpenBSD
Posts: 970
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 233Reputation: 233Reputation: 233
Anything better than 1 pass should be ok. The 35-pass scheme is a misinterpretation of Gutmann's 1996 paper.

Gutmann, Peter. (July 2225, 1996) Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory. University of Auckland Department of Computer Science. Epilogue section. (writing, "In fact performing the full 35-pass overwrite is pointless for any drive since it targets a blend of scenarios involving all types of (normally-used) encoding technology, which covers everything back to 30+-year-old MFM methods (if you don't understand that statement, re-read the paper). If you're using a drive which uses encoding technology X, you only need to perform the passes specific to X, and you never need to perform all 35 passes. For any modern PRML/EPRML drive, a few passes of random scrubbing is the best you can do. As the paper says, "A good scrubbing with random data will do about as well as can be expected". This was true in 1996, and is still true now.").
Old 11-05-2012, 01:32 PM   #4
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
thanks to both of you for the info


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Advice for backup disk partitioning scheme? thinksincode Linux - Newbie 10 02-08-2007 05:51 PM
Need advice in choosing a router R00ts Linux - Wireless Networking 8 04-21-2006 08:00 AM
Need partitioning scheme advice Geocritter *BSD 5 12-29-2005 01:07 PM
Advice on Partitioning Scheme? X_ArchAngel Slackware 12 06-30-2004 04:22 PM
advice on partioning scheme Hcman Linux - General 3 02-23-2003 08:05 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration