Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I have installed RH 9.0 on my laptop and has been using it for some time but I am getting frustrated with the time it takes to launch any application, particularly openoffice and even Netscape. My laptop cofiguration is P2 400 Mhz processor, 128MB RAM and 6 gb hdd.
Can anybody advise me as to which version of linux would run fine with this config. Is it advisable to switch to RH 8.0 or 7.0 to gain speed? Is it advisable to switch at all? Because I spent more than 10 days setting up all the hardwares, softwares and plugins.
if you're not newbie - get vector linux - it's the best small linux (and very powerfull)
for a newbie, i'd suggest libranet
martina, i didn't quite understand your reply - i have 1.8 GHz with 256MB RAM, and run win98se + mdk9.1 (which is quite similar to RedHat) and have no problems of this kind...
i find my machine VERY fast!!!
if you HAVE these problems, maybe there's some other reason for that - your hardware should be powerful enough
As my main computer I have a 366MHz IBM Thinkpad with 192MB RAM. Too slow to use with Linux? Nope. A little rusty when it comes to encoding mp3's using lame with the --alt-preset standard switch? Yeah.
Do *NOT* use heavy-weight desktop environments like KDE and Gnome. Both are slow even on a recent midrange desktop computer. Use something lighter, like Fluxbox. Works a treat.
i have kernel 2.4.21 ; my 500MB-swap memory is almost always completely free - how much swap do you have?
KDE and GNOME are heavyweight, but NOT for that kind of computer - i'm using KDE - it's EXTREMLY fast (complete boot ~1min, mozilla window ~4sec)
My laptop is not upgradable, particularly the processor is glued on the mother board (vaio f360) Hey Nechos, are there sufficient software packages arround for vector and libranet? I am a programmer and need glade, java, gcc and some other stuffs like openoffice, Evolution, gaim, mplayer.
Can I install Fluxbox in RH 9.0 and get rid of KDE? But there is no Fluxbox in the redhat distribution. And what is lame? is it a linux version or just a package
libranet has everything, you shouldn't worry about it - it's got Fluxbox, too...
vector is based on slack, and on their site it says: Full development suite with most common libraries, compilers and related tools.
Gcc updated to version 3.2.2.
I have never used Fluxbox with KDE, but I guess it won't hurt to enable the support for it.
Lame is an mp3 encoder, and very slow when you use the --alt-preset standard switch...but that's what you have to do if you want the best size vs quality performance. I know this is off topic, I only referred to it for the sake of getting my point across.
I too use Linux for programming. If you have any problems installing Java, search these forums! The question comes up once a day.