Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I've tried this on redhat and fedora now.
When I download a .iso file for a DVD, it takes 3 hours to download. Then when it's finished, it seems to start to upload back somewhere, I don't know where. So it goes, ....98 %, 99 %, 100 %, -99 %, -98 %, -97 %............. I don't get it. I downloaded a CD earlier, and it works fine, it's just DVD's - perhaps there's no support for downloading files of a particular size or something?. How should I fix this?
thanks for the sentiment re ubuntu. i have to say though that i've tried it and, well, i don't like it. this goes way against the grain of what everyone else seems to think about it, i know, but i just found it a little too sickly sweet. i totally respect the sentiments of everyone working on the project however, it's a great ethic they have, and i only had it installed for a short time, it just wasn't for me, that's all.
now wrt the iso files. it seems that it only affects large downloads from ftp sites ie dvd's. the iso cd's are fine. i'm doing the downloading through windows 2000 as of now, but i feel this is cheating somewhat. as suggested, this may be a redhat problem, so i'll try the same thing on mandrake later - not my favourite distro either by the way, maybe it's just that i'm using kde on it, but it seems like i spend half my time trying to fix it.
cheers then, if anyone has any more ideas........
Its the web browser or the download manager and it has nothing to do with Linux. If the DVD image has been splitted in a few files, download those instead. The maximum size that you can download from the internet is 2 GB. Though there is an exception to this if you compile the web browser or the download manager with large file support.
thought it was something like that, only because it just seemed so weird. Is compilation of the browser/download manager - in my case firefox - for more than 2GB download a difficult thing to do. Is there a file that can be edited?
Originally posted by dcdbutler thought it was something like that, only because it just seemed so weird. Is compilation of the browser/download manager - in my case firefox - for more than 2GB download a difficult thing to do. Is there a file that can be edited?
I use Firefox and routinely download files greater than 2 GB without any problem. It isn't Firefox that is to blame. A also use various download managers (d4x, aria, prozilla, bittornado, etc.) without any problem. My Firefox is the same one that you can download from the Mozilla site. It isn't compiled in any special way.
I don't like Fedora, Mandrake or Redhat, but to each his own. I use MEPIS and have tried all of the rest. Debian is much better than any RPM based distro which seem to inevitably result in dependency problems. I have never had a dependency problem with MEPIS. Good luck.
okay, so one person says it is the browser, someone else says it isn't. Then it may be the way it's compiled, or it may not be. Oh, and in the case of fedora, the browser wasn't downloaded from the mozilla website, it came bundled with the distro (true for redhat though). So what's the straight answer to this question - an answer with some sort of consensual agreement?
hee hee hee We're all talking about being cool on a Linux forum. Superb!
I'm not really cool either. I like Jackie Chan movies, budweiser and cheese pizza. I get stressed out even crossing the street.
Oh, but I do have the coolest distro by the way