Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello SlackHack, your name indicate that you like Slackware. I have downloaded and burnt the CDs for Slackware 10.2. Tried installing it but couldn't get anything to work, not even X or network! Why is it so different from othere? Where can I get a good admin guide for Slackware 10.2? Is it worth replacing my Ubuntu with Slack? What would u suggest?
I guess, you must be using Konqueror. So just click "Run" (Run Command) from the KMenu (Similar to Start button in windows) and type /mnt/windows.
And there you go.
Note - In most KDEs you can also see the "Run" option by right clicking anywhere on the Desktop.
There are many other ways to do this. "Run" is available in Gnome too.
Thanks for the help. I think I have it working now. Im not able to mount it to nautilus but Im also not at work anymore so im assumning thats why.
Just a little background on me. I recently had been carrying a powberbook G4 and and HP laptop. Well, I got a Macbook pro with the intel processor so I was then able to run windows XP on it. I was getting ready to ditch the HP laptop but decided to give linux a try to see if it would be worth keeping around.
I have to admit. So far i'm not to impressed. Networking seems VASTLY more difficut then in OS 10 and even windows for that matter. The thing I like most about OS X is all you have to do is plug it in. Once you do that you can browse every avaiable network resource. No setting anything up. No mounting. No nothing. Plug it in and you can access it. After the fiasco I had with trying to access a single share I think my linux adventure is pretty much over. But regardless, I appericate all the help.
Well I appreciate that u tried linux. I have used Windows 3.1, 95, 98, NT4, 2000, ME, XP, 2003 Server, LongHorn, (will try Vista soon).
And I have used Radhat Linux 6.2, 7.3, Fedora Core1, Debian 3.1r1, Kubuntu 5.10, SuSE 9.1, Knoppix, SimplyMEPIS, Mandrake 10.1, etc.
Now I am using Ubuntu 5.10 at home and Windows XP SP2 at office. It's true that Windows is user friendly but, that's also true if u learn Linux well, u would find Linux to be more friendlier and configurable than windows. But, u need to be a digger if u wish to use linux. That's the way it is.
Well I appreciate that u tried linux. I have used Windows 3.1, 95, 98, NT4, 2000, ME, XP, 2003 Server, LongHorn, (will try Vista soon).
And I have used Radhat Linux 6.2, 7.3, Fedora Core1, Debian 3.1r1, Kubuntu 5.10, SuSE 9.1, Knoppix, SimplyMEPIS, Mandrake 10.1, etc.
Now I am using Ubuntu 5.10 at home and Windows XP SP2 at office. It's true that Windows is user friendly but, that's also true if u learn Linux well, u would find Linux to be more friendlier and configurable than windows. But, u need to be a digger if u wish to use linux. That's the way it is.
I will definetly admit that linux is a much more customizable system and probably overall more powerfull. I just dont think I can bring myself to give up the ability to go on to any netwrok and seamlessly browse any resource on it. Its just a HUGE time saver.
I just dont think I can bring myself to give up the ability to go on to any netwrok and seamlessly browse any resource on it. Its just a HUGE time saver.
Yes, u r right. For regular PC users, windows is the best choice. I like it too.
Hello SlackHack, your name indicate that you like Slackware. I have downloaded and burnt the CDs for Slackware 10.2. Tried installing it but couldn't get anything to work, not even X or network! Why is it so different from othere? Where can I get a good admin guide for Slackware 10.2? Is it worth replacing my Ubuntu with Slack? What would u suggest?
i would always recommend switching to slack, it's just a great distro. you can find documentation in the slack book http://www.slackbook.org/ . you seem to know what you're doing, so maybe you just had some bad luck with your hardware. give it another try, and ask questions on the forum if you run into any problems again.
I will definetly admit that linux is a much more customizable system and probably overall more powerfull. I just dont think I can bring myself to give up the ability to go on to any netwrok and seamlessly browse any resource on it. Its just a HUGE time saver.
seamlessly browse the resources on any network? i'd love to have that capability myself.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.