Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Probably the same reason it's not loaded by the ubuntu guys. No one uses floppies any more.
It's not enough to say "well I do". You aren't the target audience. How many machines in the last 6 years have been sold with a floppy drive ?
Actually I would rephrase your statement to;
Quote:
How many new machines in the last 6 years have been sold with a floppy drive ?
From a world standpoint there are a lot of machines that still use a floppy drive as the means to exchange data, limited by today's standard but still a fair method.
So the ability to enable the hardware is a wise decision. It still surprise me as to how some still look at the situation as the only way. World situations, Universal usage should be a applied thought. Not singular!
You noticed I changed the OP's pejorative term "disabled" to "not loaded" ?
The OP always seems to take the stance that the distros make concious decisions to make things difficult.
IMHO, he needs to make an effort to understand the wider picture.
I agree but most people don't even read the documentation provided let alone try to fully understand intrinsic operations. Curiosity can be a good thing at times.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.