LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-16-2004, 06:51 PM   #1
studpenguin
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest United States
Posts: 262

Rep: Reputation: 32
Methadone distribution for recovering Windows GUI junkie?


The Distribution that is methadone for recovering Windows GUI junkie


A number of people have told me that Mandrake is the best for the Windows GUI (GRAPHICAL USERS INTERFACE) junkie that's totally use to it and doesn't have much time to learn much different.

Having a little experience with Debian, Mandrake, and Fedora (a very similar branch of of Redhat)

They all have KDE GUI . . . the nearest I've dabbled with Windows like setting . . .

They all seem to have the browsersKonquerer, Mozilla and are compatible with Opera.

I don't know which is better.

I'd just as soon there be a complete Windows GUI ripoff . . . I mean there might as well be.

The little experience I've had with Redhat/Fedora/LTSK12 vs. Mandrake 9.2 leads me to believe that Redhat/Fedora is much bettter

In a sense, redhat is supported commercially and non commercially at the same time!!! That suggests to me there is a balance of creativity out of leisure and creativity to pay the bills from its development. Is that a fair assessment or not?


, though for some reason I really love everything I've discovered on the Knoppix 3.3 (offshoot of Debian) complete CD and am tempted to install above others when the 3.4 comes out, love a lot of the different derivatives of the bootable CD and if anyone has anymore advice on the subject

of Methadone for recovering Windows users I'd love to hear more from you.
 
Old 04-16-2004, 09:19 PM   #2
jailbait
Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Blue Ridge Mountain
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Debian Jessie
Posts: 7,469

Rep: Reputation: 154Reputation: 154
"The little experience I've had with Redhat/Fedora/LTSK12 vs. Mandrake 9.2 leads me to believe that Redhat/Fedora is much bettter"

Of the rpm based distributions (Fedora, Mandrake, Red Hat, and SuSE) Mandrake is probably the easiest to install. So Mandrake is what we usually recommend to a newbie for their first installation.

Once you become more experienced with Linux then you will want to configure things your own way. Judged by configuration flexibility then SuSE is the best and Mandrake the worst of the four distributions.

", though for some reason I really love everything I've discovered on the Knoppix 3.3 (offshoot of Debian) complete CD and am tempted to install above others when the 3.4 comes out, love a lot of the different derivatives of the bootable CD and if anyone has anymore advice on the subject"

Debian is harder to install than the first four distributions that I discussed. But it is very configurable and is probably the easiest distribution to maintain. If you are interested in Debian or Knoppix I recommend that you use Debian. Knoppix is a subset of Debian and you might as well use the full enchilada.

And then there is Slackware. Slackware installs exactly what you tell it to install and no more. From there on you are own your own. People who are willing to put the work into Slackware can create some lean, mean machines.

So the choice is yours. Install whatever strikes you as meeting your needs best.

___________________________________
Be prepared. Create a LifeBoat CD.
http://users.rcn.com/srstites/LifeBo...home.page.html

Steve Stites
 
Old 04-16-2004, 11:47 PM   #3
studpenguin
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest United States
Posts: 262

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Well then again its all relative.

Bear in mind the title of this thread.

I'm asking for opinions on supporting the hardcore recovering Windows junkies for the past 8 years whose only experience with a keyboard interface file sorting being a vague recollection of MS-DOS commands long long ago.
 
Old 04-16-2004, 11:50 PM   #4
studpenguin
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Pacific Northwest United States
Posts: 262

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Re: Methadone distribution for recovering Windows GUI junkie?

Quote:
In a sense, redhat is supported commercially and non commercially at the same time!!! That suggests to me there is a balance of creativity out of leisure and creativity to pay the bills from its development. Is that a fair assessment or not?
[/B]
As I was saying or inferring, that' seems like the best of both worlds in the compatibility of a good operating system . . .

why not?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You know you're a Slackware junkie if ... dhave Slackware 69 03-12-2005 08:06 AM
Whats the best GUI Server Distribution? sud_crow Linux - Distributions 4 02-28-2005 02:25 AM
Recovering a windows partition ravalox Linux - Software 5 08-15-2004 02:37 PM
kernel junkie Robert0380 LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 1 07-08-2003 03:17 PM
Recovering Windows user drw Linux - General 1 04-06-2002 06:40 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration