LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2005, 05:03 PM   #16
kencaz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Distribution: Mandriva Slackware FreeBSD
Posts: 1,468

Rep: Reputation: 48

Well, if the CD boots on 2 other systems then it pretty much rules out the valid burn issue, however, If you had burned the CD on another drive there may be some problem with your CDR reading that it is a bootable CD.

If you have more then one drive one your system try the other drive. If not, I would suggest copy the knoppix.iso to your machine and burn the CD on YOUR Drive.

KC
 
Old 06-10-2005, 05:04 PM   #17
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 377Reputation: 377Reputation: 377Reputation: 377
Quote:
Originally posted by simple
so then the linux cd should boot fine if done properly..... point?
the point is that the bios is obviously booting the drive, as if it wasn't then the windows cd wouldn't boot... so there's no need to "hit esc" and select anything...

 
Old 06-10-2005, 05:09 PM   #18
simple
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.04
Posts: 89

Rep: Reputation: 15
that doesn't make too much sense, but i guess you're saying what he said? it's booting to the hard drive and not from cd drive? but does with the windows cd, not with a properly burned .iso as a disc image, well hitting esc he would be able to pick the cd drive, and see it "trying" to boot if there was a proper bootable disc in it, if his BIOS weren't setup properly.. and if they are should still TRY and boot, if it isn't theres something he's not saying, or is trying to say linux sucks you should use the windows cd people because it works for me? (Just a thought)

Last edited by simple; 06-10-2005 at 05:10 PM.
 
Old 06-10-2005, 05:12 PM   #19
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 377Reputation: 377Reputation: 377Reputation: 377
Quote:
Originally posted by simple
if it isn't theres something he's not saying, or is trying to say linux sucks you should use the windows cd people because it works for me? (Just a thought)
what on earth are you talking about?? LOL... he mentioned the windows cd was booting properly to rule-out that his bios might not be set to boot from the cd... it's quite simple...


Last edited by win32sux; 06-10-2005 at 05:14 PM.
 
Old 06-10-2005, 05:16 PM   #20
simple
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.04
Posts: 89

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by win32sux
what on earth are you talking about?? LOL... he mentioned the windows cd was booting properly to rule-out that his bios might not be set to boot from the cd... it's quite simple...
i'm saying then it should work and be no problem, who here could actually solve this as being a problem? if 1. bios is set up right 2. disc image is right 3. a bootable disc worked 4. the cd worked on two other computers not this one 5. we're still unsure about the light blinking, but if it is, then it's trying but not finding a boot record on the iso? maybe his computer just doesn't like knoppix before it tries it? or what, what could it be... hmm.
 
Old 06-10-2005, 05:25 PM   #21
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 377Reputation: 377Reputation: 377Reputation: 377
anyways... pilypala, i've read of similar issues occuring when a bootable ISO is burned with a "--boot-load-size" higher than 4... i'm not sure what program you used to burn the CD but this could be a reasonable explanation as to why it boots on the other PCs but not on yours... like, some BIOSes won't boot a cd if it was burned with a --boot-load-size 32, for example... take a look at what Patrick Volkerding wrote in the Slackware isolinux README:
Quote:
Techincally the --boot-load-size should be a lot bigger, like 20 or so in order to hold the isolinux.bin boot block. However, setting it to 4 causes it to load on more BIOSes. I don't know why, but I've had so many people report this to me that I'm inclined to believe it.
ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackwar...nux/README.TXT

i'm not saying this is the case here, i'm just saying it's something to consider...
 
Old 06-10-2005, 06:57 PM   #22
dosnlinux
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: slackware 11, arch 2007.08
Posts: 154

Rep: Reputation: 30
bad burn perhaps
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mepis Live CD Boot shinny Linux - Software 5 08-20-2005 03:50 AM
Boot System w/ Live CD AxXium Linux From Scratch 4 08-11-2005 07:54 AM
Live CD Boot Benchmarks adssse DamnSmallLinux 0 06-21-2005 07:32 PM
Boot Live CD using windows boot loader vivinuthappa MEPIS 7 06-20-2005 09:15 PM
Multi-Boot Live CD timothykaine Linux - Distributions 5 04-21-2005 10:42 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration