Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Hi, I'm brand new to Linux and I want to get started now that my computers hard drive crashed yesterday. I bought a 40GB hard drive and I want to use up to half of the drive for win98, and partition the rest for linux. I've had Slackware disks sitting on the shelf for about 6 months waiting for me to get off my a..., so maybe the hard drive crash was a good thing.
*can I make all my partitions using the fdisk utility that came with the slack, or is that just for setting up my linux partitions.
*I've read somewhere that making several Linux partitions can somehow make life easier rather than making one big partition+ a swap. Any suggestions on how I should divide 20 to 30 GB up for Linux?
Many more dumb questions to follow, thanks in advance.
You can make extra partitions for /home and /usr, etc, etc. But with your first installation it might be better just to have:
hda1 - win98/fat32
hda2 - /boot
hda3 - /
- then in your extended partition:
hda4 or 5 - swap
hda6 - shared/win32 that you can mount
At least that's how I have it, and I'm happy as a clam.
Originally posted by DrOzz and its also true that this is the biggest pile of nothing i have ever read...is this supposed to translate to something with meaning in the english language...
Hmm, not a good way to get along here... it's not even a "big" pile of anything...
ok, so if you can't understand that for some reason...
the double ram rule has been around for years and years, first coming around when RAM was extremely expensive for very little reward, so by allocation of around that much swap based on the amount of RAM you had would balance a trade off of speed and total memory. Now many desktop systems have in excess of 1GB of ram, because it's comparatively cheap. Would you suggest a swap partitino of 2GB??? With more than 512mb physical memory you can be hard pushed to use it all up, let alone use up twice as much swap as well. It is simply wasting space. Mind you if you wish to prove that you can personally employ 3GB of memory, you win.
first of what do you mean not a good way to get along, you comment about something i say when we are talking about ram and swap space and you come in and tell me to go pay my rent..seroiusly d00d, do you expect me to understand what you are talkinag about...second off you say the concept was around for many years and yes it was, so it doesn't hurt to tell a guy it...
Originally posted by DrOzz first of what do you mean not a good way to get along, you comment about something i say when we are talking about ram and swap space and you come in and tell me to go pay my rent..seroiusly d00d, do you expect me to understand what you are talkinag about...second off you say the concept was around for many years and yes it was, so it doesn't hurt to tell a guy it...
bliemy, it wasn't an analogy about paying rent, i meant it. ram was VERY expensive, and people couldn't afford it generally.
people also used to burn witches... think that should still be advised? ;-) I presume you're just being delibertalye facetious about these comments, it certainly reads fine.
d00d i am not delibertly being anything, and now that you posted with that explanation, i totally understand what you meant about rent and ram, how you typed it originally, i will guaruntee not 100% of the people understood a damn word you said, actually not even 50% probably understood that, but thats neither here nor there...and you think it reads fine (obviously) cause your wrote the comment, of course it reads fine...but then you had to go along and start talking about witches...no wonder i commented on your oringal post...
and as for the topic itself and back to your original post now that i understand...if it is so irrelevant nowadays, then it sounds like your saying a person shouldn't even need a swap space, is that correct?