LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Newbie (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/)
-   -   Linux on a tired old laptop? (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/linux-on-a-tired-old-laptop-32537/)

joeberk 10-11-2002 10:12 AM

Linux on a tired old laptop?
 
Here's my situation:

I have an old Compaq LTE5280 laptop. It's got a Pentium 120mhz processor, 32MB of RAM, 1MB of video RAM, and just over 1GB on the HD. I've got some sort of PCMCIA network card in the laptop, along with a PCMCIA modem.

Also, you have to swap the floppy & CD-ROM drives, so you can't have both in the machine at once. (Though I can setup the machine such that it boots into DOS and can recognize the CD-ROM drive).

It's basically unusable under Windows 9X.

I'd like to try Linux on it. All I really need on it is a web browser (so my wife and I can check mail via the WWW), the ability to SSH to my web host (which isn't a big deal), and the ability to (later) setup my PCMCIA modem. As best I can tell, GNOME and KDE are too much for my machine - so I'd be using X Windows version 3.

I've tried Vector Linux, with no success - apparently, you can't run the setup from the CD-ROM. I've also had no luck with the instructions they give.

So here's my questions:

1) Are there any mistakes in my (newbie) logic?

2) Can I get X running on the laptop and it be usable?

3) Are there any other distros I should try? Would I be able to install a Debian or Slackware (which are above my level of understanding, admittedly) and it be usable?

All help is appreciated.

stickman 10-11-2002 10:36 AM

Your machine is quite usable. Although it's not running Linux, I've got a similar machine running OpenBSD with X and Fluxbox. It's rather snappy considering the hardware.

joeberk 10-11-2002 10:56 AM

Are you running a recent version of OpenBSD, or an older version?

I'm concerned about the version of X, as I've seen ver. 4 is for faster machines than mine.

stickman 10-11-2002 03:00 PM

I'm running OpenBSD 3.1 on it. XFree86 is at 4.2.0. It's done pretty well so far considering that it only has 32MB RAM and 2 MB video RAM. It doesn't have a CD so my only install option was floppy and FTP.

joeberk 10-11-2002 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stickman
I'm running OpenBSD 3.1 on it. XFree86 is at 4.2.0. It's done pretty well so far considering that it only has 32MB RAM and 2 MB video RAM. It doesn't have a CD so my only install option was floppy and FTP.
Hmm - I'll give it a try. I had heard you shouldn't bother with XFree86 4 unless you had a Pentium 200 or greater...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.