Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Why do so many people post a link to that page. I've went through and answered the questions differently and the result is always pretty much the same, at least for a desktop system, fedora, ubuntu, mandriva, debian, and mint, just listed in a different order.
Whoever made that should include more possible results than just the obvious choices.
I know my processor is 64 bit, but i want to know which linux among 386,686,86-64 i should install.is there any advantages or disadvantages of these configurations?
Again, if you have a 64 bit machine, load a 64 bit distribution. And for every 'advantage' someone will point out to a particular distribution, someone else will think that it's a DISadvantage. It's personal preference, so asking what is 'best' is like asking "what food is best?". Linux is free...you can try them ALL, and it won't cost you anything.
If you're a new user, focus on something easy to load onto consumer-grade systems, with good support for peripherals. Linux Mint or Ubuntu are good choices. Server distros like CentOS, SLES, or RHEL don't typically support things that servers don't have...like sound cards, bluetooth, webcams, etc., and if they do, it can be a challenge to get them working. The newest RHEL/CentOS systems don't even have a GUI installed by default.
Since you have i3 and i5, which both can support 32-bit and 64-bit, go for 64-bit (x86_64).
If you have 64-bit os installed, then you can run programs compiled for i386, i486, i586, i686 and x86_64 (preferred: x86_64)
If you have 32-bit os installed, then you can run programs compiled for i386, i486, i586 and i686 (preferred: i686)
I am having Intel i3 and I5 processor in my PC and Laptop. can you suggest me what will be the best Linux. 386 or 686 or 86-64.
Both the i3 and i5 are 64-bit processors, so you should download your distribution of choice's x86_64 (or AMD64, or simply 64-bit) version if you want to take advantage of 64-bit hardware capabilities. However, both the i386 and i686 versions will work fine, though the i686 is preferable due to support for newer hardware features that the old Intel 80386 lacks. i686 might even be preferable if you're using an application like Steam or Citrix Receiver that doesn't have 64-bit support.