Just out of curiosity, what version of Centos was that?
Also (you may know this or not), but RH backports fixes to stuff, so the first couple of nums in a kernel version aren't definitive of its age. Simlarly for other SW. |
@pdxmusl
How about Arch? It just installs to a bare minimum working system (with no GUI). You can add all the packages you want to customize it, and all of the packages are not modified except if they otherwise wouldn't work right (unlike other distros which tend to want to modify and brand every package they can lay their hands on). |
Quote:
I'm was testing out 5.5. I may still go back to it. I wasn't completely aware that stuff gets back ported. But the kernal it's using can be found in distros from 2006. It may be heavily modified. That's fine. It makes sense really, given what it's intended to be used for. Which is long term stability. But there were a lot of issues I had in centos that I was having back in the early 2000's. Which.. getting reintroduced to linux after so many years... wasn't very encouraging. Linux is community driven, and hopefully one day I'll make some positive contributions. So.. not expecting all my thrown together old hardware to immediately start working. I expect to and have had to tweak something in every distro i've tested. I'm fine with that else I wouldn't be doing it. But to be honest, given the ages of the hardware I am using. I expected the majority of the tweaking would be downloading and configuring new drivers. If they didn't exist... i'd know I needed to write one, or replace the hardware with something that does have drivers. Instead.... I found drivers but they weren't compatible with the kernal. It was too old or needed serious config file changes.. I realize I can up grade the kernel if I want, and have done so in the past. But... not really interested in doing that right out of the box. Right now I'm testing ubuntu. I tried fedora, but twice in the same day, fedora forgot my password and I wasn't able to log in (and I really mean fedora forgot my password.) Theres a work around of course, but that quickly turned me off. |
Quote:
You may actually find that the RHEL / Centos kernels are pretty much the same as what you find in Ubuntu or other bigger distros. They just have a somewhat weird naming convention - everything is being patched and back-ported into what *appears* to be 2.6.18 .... in fact, some kernel development is actually done (and hence super-current) by RedHat employees. Cheers, Tink |
Quote:
Arch i haven't tried yet. Nor have I done much research on it. I do want a gui though. I kind of want to get out of the 80's and buzz off my mullet. Don't get me wrong. I love the command line prompt. And in linux, I probably use it more often than not, But.... entering the new millennium now... I do expect some pretty pictures while playing around in linux. If I so choose to use the command line... it better be there. But.... I would still classify myself as a linux newbie. If i'm setting up my machine and trying to config some obscure setting. Unless I do a bunch of research on it, i probably am not going to find it in the billion config files linux has. However, if it's accessible through the gui, I'll find it in seconds or minutes. Anyway, I have an older system I'm testing things out on. The intent here is that eventually I'd upgrade my system with more modern hardware. But .. I want to know what distributions I like first. That way I can select my new hardware to what works best with the distribution I like. Generally, linux distrubutions probably have a common set of hardware they are compatible with. Some things, again, need more tweaking than others. But with the right distro in combination with the right hardware selection. I can just install... and boot.... and not worry about it. These parts here... are just for abusing. |
Quote:
Don't get me wrong... I'm not trying to rip centos. Or red hats accomplishments. I know they've contributed to the kernal. I actually liked centos quite a bit. Dispite it being a pain for me to setup my hardware. That's why, like I say, I might go back to it. All I'm saying is that it required a lot more effort for me to setup. Even though the hardware I have has been around for at least 5 years. And other distributions.. the general trend has not been that way. So.. even though I've been suggesting it. I know it's not "just the kernel". That's too simplistic of an answer. I think at this point. I need to get back into the linux world with something a little more friendly. So.. trying other distros right now. But had centos not been such a pain with my older hardware... I wouldn't have considered testing out other distros. |
How about telling us what the HW/driver you wanted to install is?
|
@pdxmusl
Yes, Arch doesn't have a GUI. But you can install X.org plus any desktop of your choice using the package manager once you successfully installed Arch. See the newbies' guide at the ArchWiki. |
Quote:
I wasn't bringing up my point as an issue to be solved. I was merely stating current experience and information I've found out. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM. |