Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am training to become a Linux administrator. someone has advised me that a Linux Cluster is one of the best way to backup Redhat. is this true?
Could you also tell me how to setup a linux cluster? is Heartbeat/Ultra monkey the way forward? i have been looking on the internet for a week to try and find instructions on how to set up a decent cluster but i have had no joy.
No idea why you'd associate a cluster with backups, are you sure that's what they meant?? Clustering can take many forms, as it's a fairly vague term. Heartbeats wouldn't be clustering in it's purest form, that'd be more something like a Beowulf cluster where the machines are collectively processing work in a distributed fashion. Heartbeats and Ultramonkey are for HA, so you do have multiple machines providing a single service, so will often be called a cluster still, but in a very different way. Best starting point for the HA side would probably be linuxha.org but this isn't a beginners guide thing, you'd normally be a very competent sysadmin before you'd go anywhere near Linux based HA. Within enterprise it's often much more common to use a separate device like an F5 LTM to provide this functionality, generally making it the network guys job, not the sysadmin.
No idea why you'd associate a cluster with backups, are you sure that's what they meant??
I think I made the same mistake you did for a minute, I have noticed on re-reading the word "data" was never mentioned, they might have meant a "fail-over cluster" which is a way to ensure services keep running when a physical machine fails, in laymens terms of the word backup, rather then the technical, data back-up we generally associate with.
I think I made the same mistake you did for a minute, I have noticed on re-reading the word "data" was never mentioned, they might have meant a "fail-over cluster" which is a way to ensure services keep running when a physical machine fails, in laymens terms of the word backup, rather then the technical, data back-up we generally associate with.
Ahh yes I see that. Yeah, as an HA standby, not a backup of data.
No, that's more for scalable parallel processing. not fail safe web servers. we've still no idea what sort of topology you're really after, but linuxha.org would be the place to start off.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.