LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Newbie (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/)
-   -   Linux and DivX (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/linux-and-divx-58185/)

mranders 05-05-2003 06:44 AM

Linux and DivX
 
How does DivX perform under Linux? Can I expect any performance betterment in converting my Windows P3 to a Linux machine?

acid_kewpie 05-05-2003 06:45 AM

superbly. definitley. http://mplayerhq.hu if you're after high qualitry playback on a low end system, use mplayer, you don't even need a windowing system running to play it back if you want to free up more cpu space. runs in erm... "Dos" if you're not familiar with Linux at all yet. also bloody good at ripping DVD's too, and playing nearly any media format you can think of.

mranders 05-05-2003 08:02 AM

Thanks, I can't wait to set up my system. BTW I am thinking about making it dual boot, could I place the movies on something like shared FAT volume?

acid_kewpie 05-05-2003 08:11 AM

yep, no problem. just don't use ntfs.

mranders 05-05-2003 11:38 PM

perfect! thanks

lokee 05-06-2003 07:59 AM

Don't forget to give Xine a try!
http://www.xinehq.de

acid_kewpie 05-06-2003 08:10 AM

*cough* xine sucks *cough*

lokee 05-06-2003 02:31 PM

You MUST be kidding acid_kewpie!
Xine is the best!

Are you drunk?:tisk:

Why don't you like Xine?

Xine is fast, and supports alot of media types...
Oh, Did I mention that Xine rules?

neo77777 05-06-2003 02:47 PM

Copying Chris :
*cough* xine sucks big time *cough*

acid_kewpie 05-06-2003 03:12 PM

Xine is fast, and supports alot of media types...

mplayer is faster, and supports more media types, auto and video outputs and has a better sense of humour.

lokee 05-06-2003 03:34 PM

OK, I'll retry mplayer another time...

lokee 05-08-2003 10:02 AM

I must admit that mplayer is better than xine...
But that doesn't mean Xine sucks, I just means than mplayer is better.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 PM.