Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
je suis étudiant en 1ere année informatique et j'ai fais une remarque dans la dernière version de frdora (14) : la présence d'une "." dans l'affiche des permission qui n'a pas de signification et qu'on trouve pas dans la documentation de Fedora .
mechakiss, as per the LQ rules, please post in English.
It looks like you're asking about files beginning with ".". These are hidden files (usually for, e.g. configuration files in your home directory) and can be seen with ls by using the -a option. If this is not what you're asking about, please, give us more details.
What he is saying is that the . folder has permissions, that according to him are irrelevant. But they are not, the permissions of . (when typing ls -la for example) are simply the permission of the folder you are in, and it is exactly the same for the .. permissions.
If it was not your question they try to reformulate (in english).
Translation: Si j'ai bien compris sa question, il affirme que les permissions du '.'. . represente le repertoire courant, et donc les permissions de '.' sont simplement les permissions du repertoire dans lequel tu observe les permissions...
Reformule ta question si j'ai de travers (et c'est un forum anglais ici, alors il faut poster en anglais)