Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Well, so I installed and used xubuntu, but didn't like the desktop environment, so I installed the full kde,
which people said they liked. I liked it.
But then i munged the X11 and unmunged it, and things were still a little wierd, and I was running out of HD
space, so I got a new HD, external, loaded all my win7
data onto it, reduced the size of my win7 partition,
skrewed the partition table up, recovered it, put my
linux data on the external, and repartitioned again,
this time with a nice big partition for linux (19G)
and for linux data (200G), and installed kubuntu, since,
well I was using KDE under Ubuntu. Only it was
completely different. I had installed xubuntu because
I was told it had a nice small footprint for older
machines, and I was starting on a different (now
thrown out) machine -- now, trying to set things up
as they were, very hard, because there is no
Ubuntu Software Center
I couldn't get Chromium to work because no flash,
the Adobe site was a non-starter, the Ubuntu Forum
told some other poor bastard (I only searched for
answers already given) the label of rank newbie for
complaining of the error message (unknown 'trusty-
partner') and was told to download the flash plugin
in Ubuntu Software Center. Only, no USC.
Fortunately, asked and answered, just posting to vent,
popped open a root terminal and ran apt-get, which
had never heard of ubuntu-software-center, but would
download something called software-center, and lo and
behold on reboot, my USC was back, and I got flash
going.
Love the spirit of Linux, the freedom, the control.
Don't love the hours you have to spend setting it up.
I have stopped using the software center after a year or so with Linux. (I was using Ubuntu, back then). It's so much slower than installing stuff from the command line, plus you can't depend on having it available when you switch to other distros (as you found out just now).
Using apt-get in the terminal will enable you to install software on any debian based system, even if it has no GUI at all. It takes a bit of time getting used to it, but once you get the hang of it you will find it to be a lot more efficient and, again, more distro-independent.
The last release of Kubuntu I installed (12.04) did not of course, use the Ubuntu software center. If you went to the KMenu on Kubuntu, Applications, System and then to Package Manager. For something used so frequently by many users, I would think they could have made it a little easier to find but that's their problem and their users I guess.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.