LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-05-2004, 12:56 PM   #1
trey85stang
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,091

Rep: Reputation: 41
Question kernel versions???


'm curious.. im a linux newb.. about 6 months under my belt so far...

My question is.. kernel 2.6.0 was relased not too long ago. Yet kernel 2.4.xx versions are still be released??

im just curious why updates are made to older kernels??

thanks:trey
 
Old 01-05-2004, 02:15 PM   #2
Poprocks
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 243

Rep: Reputation: 55
It's not just the 2.4 kernels that are continuing to be maintained. Alan Cox is (well, he's on a sabbatical right now) still maintaining the 2.2 series! There are many reasons for why it is done.

2.6.0 is brand new, and people aren't quite ready to be forced to jump onto that bandwagon yet. Once 2.6 becomes more mainstream, 2.4 will not be updated as often, but it still will be updated a bit, and the focus will be almost completely switched over to 2.6.

Also, if SCO were to win this lawsuit (I'm not saying they will, but there's always the possibility) we'll need something to fall back onto. 2.2 has not been accused of containing any SCO UNIX code, so it may very well be that we'd have to switch to the 2.2 series temporarly. So you see, there are many reasons why the older kernel releases are still being maintained.

Anyone else have anything to add?
 
Old 01-05-2004, 02:33 PM   #3
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 234Reputation: 234Reputation: 234
They still maintain them for small updates and mainly security fixes, etc. Andrew Morton is now the 2.6.0 maintainer and Linus and company will be working on the 2.7.x series, etc.
 
Old 01-05-2004, 04:28 PM   #4
trey85stang
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,091

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 41
let me expand on my question a bit more.. why is it that 2.3/2.5 series all seem to be development/unstalble Why is there not a mainstream release of these kernels??
 
Old 01-05-2004, 04:34 PM   #5
h/w
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: New York, NY
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 1,286

Rep: Reputation: 46
2.<odd numbers> indicate that the developers are working on it, and to be treated as such, with caution. you would likely use the unstable ones if there was suddenly a new piece of hardware that has a driver written for it and is still waiting to have a patch for a stable release. OR if you;re one of the developers and need to be workin on the kernel.

2.<even numbers> are what are deemed stable, with a lot of bug fixes and minor enhancements comin from the previous 2.<odd number> kernels.

its akin to knowing that MS longhorn is under development, and will be released in a few years ONLY after a lot of testing has been done to say it's stable. but the difference is ... you cant get it while its being developed as its not OS.
 
Old 01-05-2004, 05:28 PM   #6
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 234Reputation: 234Reputation: 234
Quote:
Originally posted by trey85stang
let me expand on my question a bit more.. why is it that 2.3/2.5 series all seem to be development/unstalble Why is there not a mainstream release of these kernels??
There are, the odd become even numbers which are then deemed stable. Its not like they are totally different kernel's.

2.5.x is the same as 2.6.0 but with all the changes made to make it stable and ready for production. It would be very confusing if they did it like this and making every other release stable, then not stable, etc:

2.5.1 = unstable
2.5.2 = stable
2.5.3 = unstable
2.5.4 = stable

and so on..

Instead 2.2.x = stable, 2.3.x = unstable, 2.4.x = stable... etc....
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kernel versions r.stiltskin Debian 1 10-23-2004 10:25 AM
How to keep modules/drivers across kernel recompiles and kernel versions? Pisces107 Linux - General 5 01-21-2004 09:29 PM
Kernel versions i286 Linux - General 3 01-11-2004 01:07 PM
Kernel versions bharden Linux - Software 5 05-27-2003 04:56 PM
Kernel Versions 0versight Linux - Newbie 5 01-16-2003 10:58 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration