LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-15-2004, 09:24 PM   #1
ToothlessRebel
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: FL, USA
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 190

Rep: Reputation: 30
Kernel


Will updating the kernel affect the files on the computer? I guess to put it correctly, can it be made not to, if done correctly?
 
Old 11-15-2004, 09:46 PM   #2
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,544
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 57
Updating the kernel won't do any damage. It's not like Windows, you're just updating/recompiling the one file, usually on a seperate partition than the rest of your files so it shouldn't be an issue.

Rather than struggling to make it not damage your files, it's more the other way around
 
Old 11-15-2004, 09:52 PM   #3
Mega Man X
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 64
No, theoretically. But if not done correctly, you may lose sound, hardware support, heck, you may not even be able to boot again...

Though, unless you need to add support for a specific hardware that you cannot use, there's _no_ need to compile a new kernel. It won't make your PC any faster or any more secure. If you want speed, disable unnecessary services, if you want security, make sure to configure your firewall nicely.

Just recompile the kernel if you need to add support to some piece of hardware or for learning purposes.

Now wait until somebody bashes me for saying that, but I really think that recompiling the kernel is pretty useless, in most cases. However, look into this thread if you still want to go ahead and do it:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ghlight=kernel

Good luck!
 
Old 11-16-2004, 06:22 PM   #4
ToothlessRebel
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: FL, USA
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 190

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks for putting my fears to rest. I have a SATA hard drive, which is unsupported by my kernel. I have long hope to one day try to recompile a new kernel. So, yes, I want to do this as both a learning and a productive experience. It's just that I had such a "learning" experience just getting it to work the first time, I was worried.

Chances are, I'll do something to ruin everything anyway, but at least I can get back to where I am now, and know what not to do again.

Many thanks yet again,
-TR
 
Old 11-16-2004, 06:45 PM   #5
ToothlessRebel
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: FL, USA
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 190

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
One more thing, I (I know this may be a sin, but I know no other way) "taint my kernel" with an intel driver module for my modem. Shortly, this modem will no longer be nessecary, but support for it will still be appreciated because my machine moves around a lot with me, and not always within range of broadband services. Will I have to replace this module in the file I modified to make it load at boot time? It didn't look like changing the kernel would change this, but forgive me I'm new to this.
 
Old 11-16-2004, 09:50 PM   #6
comprookie2000
Gentoo Developer
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Lauderdale FL.
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,291
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 56
Hope this helps about the modem;
http://65.70.147.202:8080/gromitkc/winmodem.html
 
Old 11-17-2004, 08:24 PM   #7
ToothlessRebel
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: FL, USA
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 190

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Well, I'm not having a problem with the modem, it's working great. That wasn't my question at all. If you'd like for me to add mine to your list of linmodems I shall, but as the user that helped with setting it up pointed out to me, the chipset is already on most HCLs.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kernel 2.4 in Zipslack (Waring: unable to open an initial console | Kernel Panic...) kurtamos Linux - General 2 05-10-2006 01:58 PM
Kernel-Patch Debian Logo 2.6.2 not correctly working for custom kernel 2.6.11 smp deepclutch Debian 3 06-27-2005 04:59 AM
kernel panic: try passing init= option to kernel...installation with Red Hat 9 kergen Linux - Hardware 1 09-30-2004 04:28 AM
Unable to build NVIDIA kernel module / determin kernel version Night Ink Fedora 2 05-31-2004 05:54 PM
Kernel 2.4.23 compile causes kernel panics on ATA RAID-1 (mirror) array Raptor Ramjet Slackware 3 12-18-2003 02:40 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration