Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Does anyone understand what is it about?
Know i can't mount my dvd. It says that mount: fs type subfs not supported by kernel
Did i forget to check something in xconfig?
"enable loadable module support" is enabled in the kernel config and i compiled all the filesystems in the kernel just to make sure. Nothing happened.
I also opened the .config file of my 2.6.4-smp kernel that works fine and use the exact options. Again nothing. I still can't use the dvd and the weird messages at boot remain.
I searched the options and there wasn't something such as subfs. I checked everything that was about CD and fs but still the same.
I think there may be something else. After i execute the make bzImage modules, make modules_install and copy the necessary files to /boot, i run mkinitrd and the output is
Code:
linux:/home/ioannidis/kernel/linux-2.6.8.1 # mkinitrd
Root device: /dev/sda2 (mounted on / as reiserfs)
Module list: ata_piix sata_promise reiserfs
Kernel image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.4-52-smp
Initrd image: /boot/initrd-2.6.4-52-smp
Shared libs: lib/ld-2.3.3.so lib/libc.so.6 lib/libselinux.so.1
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-disk. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-floppy. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-disk. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-floppy. Is modules.dep up to date?
Modules: kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/libata.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/sata_promise.ko kernel/fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.ko kernel/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.ko kernel/drivers/ide/ide-cd.ko
Bootsplash: SuSE (1024x768)
Kernel image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.7
Initrd image: /boot/initrd-2.6.7
Shared libs: lib/ld-2.3.3.so lib/libc.so.6 lib/libselinux.so.1
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-disk. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-floppy. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-disk. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-floppy. Is modules.dep up to date?
Modules: kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/libata.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/sata_promise.ko kernel/fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.ko kernel/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.ko kernel/drivers/ide/ide-cd.ko
Bootsplash: SuSE (1024x768)
Kernel image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.8.1
Initrd image: /boot/initrd-2.6.8.1
Shared libs: lib/ld-2.3.3.so lib/libc.so.6 lib/libselinux.so.1
Cannot determine dependencies of module reiserfs. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-disk. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-floppy. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-cd. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module reiserfs. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-disk. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-floppy. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-cd. Is modules.dep up to date?
Modules: kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/libata.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/sata_promise.ko
Bootsplash: SuSE (1024x768)
Kernel image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.8.1.old
Initrd image: /boot/initrd-2.6.8.1.old
Shared libs: lib/ld-2.3.3.so lib/libc.so.6 lib/libselinux.so.1
Cannot determine dependencies of module reiserfs. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-disk. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-floppy. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-cd. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module reiserfs. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-disk. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-floppy. Is modules.dep up to date?
Cannot determine dependencies of module ide-cd. Is modules.dep up to date?
Modules: kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/libata.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/ata_piix.ko kernel/drivers/scsi/sata_promise.ko
Bootsplash: SuSE (1024x768)
Also while mounting windows partitions i get this
mount: fs type vfat not supported by kernel
mount: fs type ntfs not supported by kernel
Don't know if this is relevant or not, but if you were running a 2.4 kernel, the modules seem to have undergone a large change. Instead of .o they seem to be .ko and aren't loading with modprobe. Now I get to go check my logs and some other info to see if I can figure out how to load modules again.
(With a 2.6.x kernel)
File systems --->
Pseudo Filesystems --->[*] /proc file system support[*] /dev file system support (OBSOLETE)[*] Automatically mount at boot[*] Virtual memory file system support (former shm fs) hope this helps
I was running the kernel 2.6.4-smp which was precompiled by Suse and running fine. It was in rpm format.
I'll try what comprookie2000 proposed and post back.
2.6 kernels are way better and faster. 2.6.7 is quite stable. so is 2.6.8.1 and the 2.6.9 snaps, but some apps (like k3b and dvd-tools) need to catch up with the post 2.6.8 kernels.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.