Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I'm guessing that KDE and Gnome are the two main window managers everyone uses. I was wondering if someone could gimme a break down. Which one is better ? What are the pros and cons of using either or both ? Which one is more robust and user friendly ? Questions of this type are what I would like to know the answers to ......... specifically refering to the newer version KDE 3.3.1 and GNome 2.8.1
it's purely a matter of preference...although i find KDE a lot like MS windows in the way it's set up and works and stuff. i used KDE in the beginning because it was "familiar" and friendly, but i'm truly addicted to fluxbox now, so i can't tell you the last time i even logged into KDE. if you're coming from a windows machine...you might be more comfy with KDE.
There have been lots of threads about this issue. search around to find out some responses to the previous threads. like posted above it's a matter of choice and whether one fulfills your needs when compared to the other.
If I know my facts right KDE is an all in one Desktop and Window Manager. You can not change the window manager in the KDE env.
Pros: More consistency and in ways can be more stable because it is installed together and united together.
Cons: you can't have the choice that Linux users usally want
Gnome is just a desktop manager and is packaged with a default window manager but can be changed at anytime.
I just read on this so correct me if I am wrong,
From my expierence, GNome is VERY VERY straight forward. Ill back this up to the death. It is, thats the window manager I show everyone, because its easy to navigate, even the drop down is easy. Tho, its not as customizeable as KDE, its gets you there. Its not loaded with softwrae either, its faster, and lighter on the memory. And, like MAC. Theres not much that is made from 3rd part developers...
KDE on the other hand is very customizable, very. But it'll get a new user confused after a while, since som distros come with a configuration utility, well, so does KDE. Gnome has one to, but it somewhat coinsides with the vendors config util's. And, lately, its become very very bloated. Making it slow, and fat. All in all, I like GNome more, but Fluxbox is my window manager.