LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-27-2005, 06:58 PM   #1
linuxfond
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 475

Rep: Reputation: 30
KDE versus Gnome - another non-essential linuxquestion.


Hi folks,
I got three boxes here, all run Linux. Everything works, except Totem (it crashes as soon as I want to use it - never mind...)
Gnome runs smoothly. KDE is slow and buggggy - terminal shows, "not-found", "error", "missing", etc etc etc .
I wonder why Gnome is OK, and KDE is not. Do you have the same experience? Is KDE a good and reliable system? Simplicity, reliability and usability are the prioriites here.
Fluxbox is so far the best, but, Gnome is sort of nice when I can stick my USB-pencil in and an icon appears on the desktop - no need to mount anything etc. Its kind of nice to have the dog bark instead of you.
Thanks for your expert comments.
 
Old 01-27-2005, 07:30 PM   #2
jlinkels
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire
Distribution: Debian Wheezy/Jessie/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 4,493

Rep: Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636
Dunno....

I have listened to a few gurus in my neighbourhood and they recommended KDE. I installed it, and stuck with it. Yes, it gives some errors, but I installed 2.x and upgraded later to 3.2 and I also did a few Stupid Things (tm)

On some other boxes I did a net install from the Debian Sarge installer, and installed KDE 3.2. No problem at all. One of the boxes I did a dist-upgrade (hey, this is Debian, man) and that installed KDE 3.3. Smooth and without any problems.

So I would say that KDE is just fine. If you choose Gnome, it is just for personal preference, but not for technical reasons.

jlinkels
 
Old 01-27-2005, 07:35 PM   #3
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,544
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 57
I'm not a fan of KDE, Konqueror isn't bad but that's all the turns me on. Oh and it has nice Bluetooth support as well! I think Gtk draws much nicer looking stuff than Qt though so I use fluxbox with all Gtk apps, works for me

Maybe you could try having a look at Xfce 4.2, it's a lightweight desktop environment and it's actually not too bad these days.
 
Old 01-27-2005, 07:40 PM   #4
linuxfond
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 475

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Yeah, lightweght + terminal....
OK, I feel the trend.
 
Old 01-27-2005, 07:55 PM   #5
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 75
What version of KDE are you running. Also you may have to note that your particular problems could be a result of Mandrake's version of KDE and not stock KDE itself. Mandrake tinkers around with GNOME and KDE so in the process they can cause problems that may not be present in other distros. Also if things are not being found etc by your KDE desktop, maybe there is something wrong with your KDE installation or configuration.
 
Old 01-28-2005, 01:37 PM   #6
tuxombie
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Chennai, India
Distribution: Slackware 10, Ubuntu, Debian Sarge
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 15
Dont remember Mandrake, but in Slackware 10 KDE 3.2 is very fast. So is Gnome.
 
Old 01-28-2005, 03:55 PM   #7
perfect_circle
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Athens, Greece
Distribution: Slackware, arch
Posts: 1,783

Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Dont remember Mandrake, but in Slackware 10 KDE 3.2 is very fast. So is Gnome.
That's so true. In FC2 KDE is awful and gome is nice and looks like KDE
In Slackware 10 KDE is extremely fast.
 
Old 01-28-2005, 10:15 PM   #8
infidel
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Easley, SC, US
Distribution: Ubuntu 7.10, Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 91

Rep: Reputation: 15
I agree with an earier poster who said that Konqueror is the best thing about KDE.

On my Mandrake 9.2 system, KDE 3.1 was slow, buggy, and extremely crashhappy (I realize there are newer versions; I haven't been interested). GNOME seemed to lack something I couldn't quite put my finger on. I found everything I wanted in XFce4 (http://xfce.org). Fast, powerful, highly configurable, and slanted toward GTK (thus faster and more stable, in my experience; though XFce runs KDE/Qt apps just fine for me).

XFce's native file manager is a very odd little construction, but everything else rocks. Give it a look.

(Yes, I know, I went way off-topic-- but why not, when there's something that might be better?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KDE versus Fluxbox Sound Problem Murdock1979 Linux - Software 2 09-23-2005 08:41 AM
linuxquestion.org on IRC? w0lv3rin3 LQ Suggestions & Feedback 12 03-01-2005 02:55 PM
KDE versus Gnome: which do you like and why enigma Z Linux - Software 15 11-16-2004 07:39 PM
linuxquestion.org alveric LQ Suggestions & Feedback 4 06-16-2004 07:25 AM
LinuxQuestion.org File?? crashmeister LQ Suggestions & Feedback 5 05-28-2002 06:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration