Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I read the LFS manual through about three times, then tried it on an old laptop. It was interesting and fun, and I mostly got it finished, but it's not something I'd go for to use everyday. It was definitely a learning experience. If I had the time I might try it again on an old computer.
I don't understand (fully) the "question" (or:
MCP, A+, JNCIA, CCNA, CNA, BSC, SSC(2)
EOTM(Wendy's), PCMCiA, PCi, Vesa, TheDraw
MSDoS 3.0+, Novell 3.2, OS/2 Warp, PhD, TiL
PCMCiA, RoFL, TWeRP) but it depends on what part your referring?
There is reading (also hinted.) Then centered in my browser at lest with 1366x768 resolution this version of my signature (x.x) kinda looks like a flying saucer. I believe all links in the world to be only examples as truth is again and again rewrote... Then there's ((hinted from) binary, seems fitting from a computer) hello (and just as the) world (encrypted...) Plus,
I edit my posts ✌ :spelling, com and always more to +
Last edited by jamison20000e; 03-19-2014 at 11:31 PM.
LFS is a fun way to learn not just how a Linux distribution works but also how they are put together, more or less.
Granted, my biggest beef with LFS is that the authors seem bent on not introducing one critical feature that'd make an LFS system a lot more practical, maintenence-wise: Package management.
They spend a page on it basically explaining why they don't do it, then link you to a file that explains what FORMS of package management there are, but nary a word on how to IMPLEMENT a package manager. I'd love to see something describing in detail a way to set up a local package manager for an LFS build so that you can track what's installed more properly. You'd still be responsible for grabbing and building new software yourself, but there's still hugs advantages to using a package manager and NOT the Makefile to actually install it.
That's probably the biggest reason why LFS gets the "Well, I built it, I'll use it for a few days then wipe it off my disk" treatment. Great for learning, not so great for using, since you can't really upgrade or remove packages without a lot of work. Though people can and have managed to make LFS their desktop.
Heck, the LFS guide even outright says to upgrade just about anything in the core it's better to rebuild the whole system. This is NOT how a normal Linux distribution handles a core package update. If glibc or the kernel need upgrading, it just upgrades that part. It doesn't reinstall your entire core package setup.
Long rant short: LFS is great for learning how to build and maintain a Linux system at the low levels, but without a package manager it's just not that usable for anything beyond that.