Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
05-18-2011, 05:27 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: Linux Mint 14 Nadia 32-bit, Pear Linux 6 32-bit
Posts: 107
Rep:
|
Is it dangerous to remove linux-image files to install Usplash?
I want to install Usplash so that my boot menu doesn't look so grim and ugly anymore. But when I tried to install Usplash through synaptic, it wanted to remove both sets of linux images from my new Debian 6.0 distro.  I didn't think that was a good idea, so I cancelled the install.
What would happen if I followed thorough? How can I change the way my boot menu looks without Usplash? Is that possible? I have NO experience with this new grub setup. I really miss the old Grub -- one file to rule them all. I have a dual boot machine, by the way. Also, I already downloaded startupmanager, but it only controls the order in which kernels appear in my menu.
I have very little faith in my ability to change it manually after attempting, and failing, to change the background and theme of gdm3 -- another unnecessary software "upgrade" I don't care for.
I'm afraid that if I screw things up with grub/boot I may not even be able to boot up the computer at all, so I'm even more wary of tampering with it.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Last edited by acraig; 05-18-2011 at 05:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 05:39 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04, PuppyLinux 5.2.5
Posts: 162
Rep: 
|
How many kernel images do you have? If the current kernel is working with your system, removing older versions won't hurt, although it's really a good idea to keep at least one extra in case something goes awry with the current version.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 05:51 PM
|
#3
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 12,524
|
Mr. Bill is right. Besides that, Usplash will not change anything on your bootmenu, it displays a splash-screen while booting.
If you rather want Grub instead of Grub2 the just install it, it is in the Debian repositories.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 06:14 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: Linux Mint 14 Nadia 32-bit, Pear Linux 6 32-bit
Posts: 107
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Bill
How many kernel images do you have? If the current kernel is working with your system, removing older versions won't hurt, although it's really a good idea to keep at least one extra in case something goes awry with the current version.
|
There are two different images that came with Debian 6.0; one ends with 686 the other 486. I boot into 686 by default. I've never tried the other. But both are marked for removal when I try to install usplash. Don't understand why.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 06:20 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: Linux Mint 14 Nadia 32-bit, Pear Linux 6 32-bit
Posts: 107
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
Mr. Bill is right. Besides that, Usplash will not change anything on your bootmenu, it displays a splash-screen while booting.
If you rather want Grub instead of Grub2 the just install it, it is in the Debian repositories.
|
I've read that it's a bad idea to remove grub2 for grub legacy, and supposedly unnecessary. If I need to upgrade the kernel later it may interfere with that ability. Each time I tried (unsuccessfully) to upgrade Dreamlinux 3.5, I was told there was an issue with my grub. And Dreamlinux 3.5 came with grub legacy. That's why I wanted to try Usplash on this distro.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 06:23 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04, PuppyLinux 5.2.5
Posts: 162
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by acraig
There are two different images that came with Debian 6.0; one ends with 686 the other 486. I boot into 686 by default. I've never tried the other. But both are marked for removal when I try to install usplash. Don't understand why.
|
Yeah, that doesn't make sense. Anyway, can you "unmark" them and still continue with the installation?
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 06:33 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: Linux Mint 14 Nadia 32-bit, Pear Linux 6 32-bit
Posts: 107
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Bill
Yeah, that doesn't make sense. Anyway, can you "unmark" them and still continue with the installation?
|
Just tried it, and no, it did not work. Also, it wanted to remove something called live-boot and initramfs-tools(sp?) also.
|
|
|
|
05-19-2011, 11:22 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: Linux Mint 14 Nadia 32-bit, Pear Linux 6 32-bit
Posts: 107
Original Poster
Rep:
|
???
Would it be possible to download Usplash from a repository and install it manually without issues? It doesn't seem to require dependencies installed just software removed.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|