Interesting, I thought you meant the ancient RH.
RH and RHEL are two different things.
Just curious, how did you get RHEL ? You bought it ?
As far as I know, RHEL has an free equivalent version called CentOS, and if I am not wrong, RHEL-x = CentOS-x for whatever x.
Since I hit into various graphic problems even with the latest CentOS5.2, (i.e., even a simple glxgears will crash the Xorg! see
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/...forumpost61648 ) and Intel GM 965 chipset +graphic controller.
But since I am not a big 3D graphic user, so CentOS-5.2-GM965chipset-glxgears crash
problem is not that a big problem for me right now.
If what applies to CentOS5.2 will also apply to RHEL5.2, then I expect you might have a problem.
Finally, since CentOS 5.1 sucks (can't even get 1280x800 resolution) for Intel 965 chipset according to my experience, hence I think you only hope is RHEL5.2.
But I think I need to emphasize is that CentOS-5.2 works okay for GM965 chipset (as long as you don't stress the 3D graphics) and perfectly okay for older Intel graphic cards (I can run beryl perfect on
CentOS-5.2 with Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrate
d Graphics Controller).
Anyone else has other comments about CentOS intel GM965 chipset experience ?
I am hoping that CentOS or RHEL can spend a little of their time to handle the GM965 chipset in the newer version! (noted added: may be "yum update" on CentOS5.2 will fix GM965 graphic problem but I don't intend to do it right now).