LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-09-2008, 11:53 AM   #1
sanjay1979
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: New Delhi
Distribution: Solaris
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Installation of Linux in 300 MHz with 128 MB ram


Hi

I am very new to Linux, but very keen to learn it.

I am having a desktop of 300 MHz with 128 MB RAM and 30 GB hard drive with Windows XP.
My first question is - Is there any version/flavour of Linux available that can be installed on above system especially Fedora with less compromise in terms of speed?

I am also having a 6 GB extra hard drive.

Please give me the suggesion what should I do ?
- Should I Make a dual operating system
- or use separate hard drive for linux as I am afraid using dual opearing system as if it may disturb Windows XP also, thereby making other windows based application non functional.

Also if u could show me the way to install linux, I would be very grateful.

Please help me out.

Thanks in advance.
 
Old 03-09-2008, 12:39 PM   #2
Samotnik
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Belarus
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable
Posts: 471

Rep: Reputation: 40
Any distro will work when properly tuned. You only can't use a modern desktop environments - KDE and Gnome. That's why Ubuntu and Kubuntu are unsuitable for you.
Any other distro allowing you to install lightweight window manager (xfce, fluxbox, windowmaker, icewm, etc.) during installation will fit perfectly. Fedora are able to be such a distro.
You are starting to learn linux - than you MUST make a dual-boot system.
You can use separate drive, or just rearrange partitioning of your hard drive to make room for linux. It doesn't matter.
 
Old 03-09-2008, 01:01 PM   #3
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Indeed you cannot use extremely bloated window managers such as KDE and GNOME.

I think fluxbox or icewm are very good choices for you.

XFCE is a rather fat rat, it claims to be light, but it's not that light, not light enough.

For older computers good distros would be Slackware, Debian, DSL, etc. but none can be run with KDE or GNOME. These would be good choices because not only are they light by default as opposed to bloated by default like some / most other well-known distros. They are also easier to customize and keep light.
 
Old 03-09-2008, 02:09 PM   #4
sanjay1979
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: New Delhi
Distribution: Solaris
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks H_TeXMeX_H and Samotnik for ur useful tips.
Samotnik, Can making dual opeating system cause damage to my exisiting windows environment ?
 
Old 03-09-2008, 02:33 PM   #5
alan_ri
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Croatia
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux
Posts: 1,733
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 127Reputation: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanjay1979 View Post
Can making dual opeating system cause damage to my exisiting windows environment ?
Yes it can if it's not done properly.I suggest that for start you try Puppy Linux.Installation is not a problem,you just have to be careful with partitionis you make and format.You must put GRUB or LILO on the MBR.This sign / means root file system,and that's the sign you choose for your newly made partition.You must also create SWAP partition(500 MB would be ok),and for filesystem choose EXT2 or EXT3 or RAISERFS.Don't forget,LQ is your friend!
 
Old 03-09-2008, 08:10 PM   #6
sanjay1979
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: New Delhi
Distribution: Solaris
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks alan_ri
definitely I will keep it in my mind.
 
Old 03-09-2008, 09:00 PM   #7
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,473
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525
Hi,

You could roll back to earlier versions of Slackware. Maybe Slackware 10.2/11 for the legacy hardware. You can always use a light desktop. XFCE is not that light but it's not bloated either.
Fluxbox or Blackbox would be another good choice. Depending on how you want to use the system would really dictate the 'X' choice. You could alwys just use the apps within a 'X', run linksys or firefox launched from the cli.

My reason for the suggestion of not attempting a newer distro is that most of the earlier hardware won't be supported (legacy). You would have to tweak a lot for any of the modern distro to get it working. If at all.
 
Old 03-11-2008, 12:30 PM   #8
sanjay1979
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: New Delhi
Distribution: Solaris
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks onebuck
I would opt for Slackware and if I encounter any problem then I will let u know. Thanks once again.
 
Old 03-11-2008, 12:38 PM   #9
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Rep: Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck View Post
Hi,

You could roll back to earlier versions of Slackware. Maybe Slackware 10.2/11 for the legacy hardware. You can always use a light desktop.
Are there security updates available for Slackware 10.2/11 or are you running an open box then?
 
Old 03-11-2008, 01:13 PM   #10
pwc101
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,847

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
There are still Slackware security updates back as far as version 8.1.
 
Old 03-11-2008, 01:25 PM   #11
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Rep: Reputation: 47
Wow - poor Patrick.Maintenance for all that stuff got to be a major headache.
 
Old 03-11-2008, 09:18 PM   #12
ehawk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,257

Rep: Reputation: 48
You can dual boot. It is normally not a problem to repartition and install on the same hard drive. Back up anything really important.

Consider PCLinuxOS mini-me:

http://www.pclinuxos.com/index.php?o...&topic=38535.0

or alternate CD install of xubuntu, then install fluxbox and use that instead of xfce

http://www.xubuntu.org/get

Those are both excellent choices for a newbie with older hardware. Quite user friendly, and it guides you through repartitioning the hard drive.

I know this forum has lots of slackware lovers, but I would stay away from it as a newbie.

Last edited by ehawk; 03-11-2008 at 09:23 PM.
 
Old 03-11-2008, 09:24 PM   #13
revenge80200
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Lenny & Xp
Posts: 238

Rep: Reputation: 30
What sort of ram does that thing take? How much will it take?

Eric.
 
Old 03-12-2008, 12:08 PM   #14
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,473
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525Reputation: 1525
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehawk View Post
You can dual boot. It is normally not a problem to repartition and install on the same hard drive. Back up anything really important.

Consider PCLinuxOS mini-me:

http://www.pclinuxos.com/index.php?o...&topic=38535.0

or alternate CD install of xubuntu, then install fluxbox and use that instead of xfce

http://www.xubuntu.org/get

Those are both excellent choices for a newbie with older hardware. Quite user friendly, and it guides you through repartitioning the hard drive.

I know this forum has lots of slackware lovers, but I would stay away from it as a newbie.
Why, afraid to learn something? Eat pablum and that is what you will taste. Get your feet wet with a real OS and learn something along the way. Not everyone needs a GUI to do something with a system.

There are ways too learn anything. When given the proper material or instructions then anything can be done without a lot of effort. Yes, I'm a lover that happens to use Slackware as my operating system. My wife is rather jealous so my love is for her. I like Slackware!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will kernel-2.6 work with Cyrix M II 300 MHz shahak Linux - Software 13 02-27-2008 11:39 PM
Best distro of Linux for my Pentium 100 mhz w/16mb ram dave247 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 04-16-2006 08:05 AM
getting an optimum OS for my intel pentium 3 750 MHz ,128 mb ram computer shyamsundar Linux - Newbie 10 02-05-2006 03:34 AM
prefer....AMD 300 mhz or intel 300mhz? farhan Linux - Hardware 5 12-08-2003 06:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:38 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration