Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i installed REd HAt 9 on an old system of mine....10.2 gb,256 mb ram ,p3
it went along smoothly,and i formatted the hard disk into 4 partitions
swap =500 mb
/boot ==200 mb
now when i try to login,it just returns the same login screen to me.
if the pass word is incorrect then it displays a wrondg password error...
i changed the inittab file to change the default run level to 3
but the same thing happens there too...
also,i installed the kerberos thing during the installl
Something like that happened to me with Slack on my lap-top, several days after installation, but only when I log as user, and only for the first time I try to login after restart - so I had to go trough log screen twice and everything would be just fine. After few days problem disappeared, I don't know how.
hey thanks guys...
bigjohn...the thing is i cant get beyond the login stage...
the login gives me another login...
so,while i was waiting for a reply i tinkered with fdisk
using linux rescue with a boot disk.
/home had a win 95 fromat...
then created a new partition fro fdisk
changed the fstab file....but it says this partition is corrupt...
so i m going to reinstall now
Well vrdhananjay, that sounds like the best thing to do.
Though you're heading in the right direction by the sound of things. Inasfaras having a seperate /home partition, because if you set stuff properly from the outset, it saves you a hell of a lot of aggrevation later.
If you're just going to have a linux only machine then ok, but if you're going to dual boot, I feel that it's often a smart move to have the seperate /home formatted for whatever you think is good (my /home and /root are both reiserfs as it seemed like a good option when I was looking into gentoo in the first place) ext2 or 3 (I'd say 3 - though I don't recall why - journaling I think??) and a different one that mounts at boot that is formatted as fat32, that way you don't have to worry about the emerging disc write ability for NTFS partitions (winXP), and both OS's can (well, should be able to) read/write to the partition for any data and stuff that you may like to use e.g. stuff like mp3 etc etc.
Currently I have
hda3-linux swap (primary)
hda4 is extended into
it dint go off so well...seems like the hard disk is corrupt...i did a lotta fdisk-ing,nothing wrong i m sure...but seems not to work even with autopartition option in the install...
anyway,this was the first time i tried a different /home partition(ext3,is reiser good?) cos i heard it is a good damage control practice.
my primary comp(i was installing on my old comp for fiddling with RTAI and the parellel port) has
sda1 xp- ntfs
hdd0- / ext3
and a swap partition... have two seperate physical drives,so no issues there...
i just mount the fat32 partitions for use for songs and movies...
never have tried to mount the ntfs part...wont until i am 100% sure...
hey,i think i just screwed up a hard disk,have to be careful....
do you think multiple attemps at installing affects the hdd..i tried thrice...
fdisk'ing a disk is dangerous only because humans are involved and they make mistakes. You can't fdisk something too many times and mess it up.
Although seperate partitions for /home can be good, it doesn't beat making regular backups. I have never had a seperate /home parition for my residential Linux installs (many years now). For simplicity's sake, you could just do:
But, that depends on what you are using it for.
As far as ntfs on linux, I wouldn't recommend using the write access that ships with the kernel. Somehow, Suse seems to have pretty good write access.
Ext3 vs. reiser is tough. I suspect reiser-variants will take over eventually, but ext3 is sufficient for now. You'll worry about upgrading your linux before you are really concerned that your filesystem is too old.