Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
05-19-2007, 04:18 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Location: Cork (Ireland)
Distribution: FreeBSD 9.1
Posts: 151
Rep:
|
Impossible to install firefox-2.0.0.3.tar.gz on RedHat V 5
Hi all,
I am new to Linux. I have used windows for the past 10 years and decided to use Linux for all the good reasons we know.
I am trying to install firefox 2.0.0.3 on my new distro RedHat v 5. I have to say that this is not working at all. I have downloaded firefox and then I have uncompressed firefox. That is as far as I went. I have tried to compile it as the .tar.gz is the source code of the soft. SO i think  I have used the command below but it didn't work. Nothing happened. I am really lost here. Can anyone help me please.
tar zxf linuxquestions.tar.gz
cd linuxquestions
./configure
make
make test (optional)
make install
Thanks for everything
Riganta
|
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 04:38 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 960
Rep:
|
you may have just downloaded a binary package in tar.gz format, look inside the directory for firefox and firefox-bin, if there is a Makefile.am and a configure file then yes you downloaded sourcecode, if there is no Makefile.am & configure file then you downloaded a pre-built binary in a tar.gz package...
|
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 04:39 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,466
Rep: 
|
Did you actually download the source code for Firefox, or the prebuilt binary? Just because a file is in .tar.gz/.tar.bz2 format for example doesn't necessarily mean it contains source code. The "tar" is for "tape archive" and the "gz" or "bz2" indicates the type of compression used.
Also, what does "linuxquestions.tar.gz" have to do with Firefox?! You also didn't say exactly what "it didn't work" means. We aren't at your machine and can't see the output from commands you use, so you need to give us detailed information - error messages for example.
|
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 05:21 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Location: Cork (Ireland)
Distribution: FreeBSD 9.1
Posts: 151
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well, I don't get any error message at all. Nothing happens. That's it.
I have dowloaded firefox from firefox's website and it seems that I have no Makefile.am & Configure file. So I have a pre built binary in tar.gz. I dowloaded firefox in /usr/local. I used the command tar zxf firefox-2.0.03.tar.gz to decompress the soft. It created another directory called firefox and then I tried to use the command below to install it or run it but nothing happened. I couldn't even get to the directory firefox.
cd firefox
./configure
make
make test
make install
PS: the "linuxquestion" is my mistake. It has no relation to the soft firefox
I hope this clarify a bit
Cheers
riganta
|
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 05:24 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Location: Cork (Ireland)
Distribution: FreeBSD 9.1
Posts: 151
Original Poster
Rep:
|
One last point. The old version that was installed is not working anymore. It has become firefox.old now. It is my mistake. I have just repeat a command line that I found in the website without really knowing what I was doing. I have to say that linux is not easy at all but a lot more fun than windows
|
|
|
|
05-19-2007, 05:57 PM
|
#6
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, OpenSuse, Slack, Gentoo, Debian, Arch, PCBSD
Posts: 6,678
Rep: 
|
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 12:15 AM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,466
Rep: 
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by riganta
I couldn't even get to the directory firefox.
|
Why not?
Sigh, you don't use "configure", "make", "make install" for pre-built packages.
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 04:06 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Location: Cork (Ireland)
Distribution: FreeBSD 9.1
Posts: 151
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I think I have messed badly my system. I had only firefox.1.5.0.3 preinstalled on it. Since it has become firefox.old it is not working anymore.
I have now managed to download and decompresse firefox.2.0.0.3. It is in my directory /usr/local but I don't how to make it work.
please help
riganta
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 04:12 AM
|
#9
|
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,466
Rep: 
|
Again, all you need to do is decompress the archive, cd to "firefox" (or whatever the directory is called) and run "./firefox". Okie pretty much told you this..
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 04:38 AM
|
#10
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, OpenSuse, Slack, Gentoo, Debian, Arch, PCBSD
Posts: 6,678
Rep: 
|
Actually Nylex, the instructions that come with firefox are crap (and that's being complimentary). Even looking at their installation instructions (which is all the readme.txt says to do) tells you nothing about running firefox. Okie didn't even really hint at that (he says to look for it), and having installed plenty of precompiled packages, I'd have thought that I had to copy the firefox executable to some other directory (which from my quick read was implied from the link I posted before). I can see if you know that's what you need to do, Okie's comment makes sense, but not otherwise.
My 2c
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 04:42 AM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Location: Cork (Ireland)
Distribution: FreeBSD 9.1
Posts: 151
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yes exactly. Doing so, I get the error message as follow
"error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Cheers
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 07:47 AM
|
#12
|
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,466
Rep: 
|
You need to install the C++ library package that provides that file, though I'm not sure what that package is called under Red Hat. It may simply be called "libstdc++-<version>", but I don't know. I assume Red Hat has some kind of tool you can use to search for packages, have a look there and tell us what you find (or if another RH user sees this thread, they'll be able to guide you).
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 02:42 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Distribution: Mainly Debian and Mepis, but also Slackware, Arch and Mandriva
Posts: 73
Rep:
|
You mentioned you're using Red Hat 5, which is years out of date (and probably explains that error), so it would be worth upgrading to a current distro (if you want to carry on with Red Hat type stuff you could use Fedora or CentOS). These will also likely include the latest version of Firefox as a binary package, which you can just install via the package manager.
eg.
Code:
# yum install firefox
(I think, I don't really use Fedora)
1337_penguin
Last edited by 1337_penguin; 05-20-2007 at 02:44 PM.
|
|
|
|
05-20-2007, 03:10 PM
|
#14
|
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,466
Rep: 
|
I assumed the OP was using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.
|
|
|
|
05-21-2007, 03:35 AM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2007
Location: Cork (Ireland)
Distribution: FreeBSD 9.1
Posts: 151
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi Guys,
Yes the op is running Red Hat ES V 5. Which is the latest version (hopefully so). I tried to install the librairy but it told that it was already there. i tried the yum install command. It didn't work either.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|