LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Newbie (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/)
-   -   Important apt-fast over apt-get (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/important-apt-fast-over-apt-get-782844/)

culaterout 01-17-2010 05:53 PM

Important apt-fast over apt-get
 
I installed and ran this script called apt-fast it uses axel a download accelerator ...

I tested it on seamonkey which was 48mb in size

Apt-get downloaded it and installed it in 48 seconds ruffley ...

Apt-fast downloaded it and installed it in 11 to 12 seconds....

I got this file downloaded in about 4 times the speed of regular apt-get..

This I believe is the original post and makers of apt-fast

APT-FAST

We need one of you math whizzes to give it a go and give use exact numbers..

Factors to consider are: internet bandwidth, cpu, ram ....

I believe the install times will be the same do to read and write times on hard drive....

here is a easy way to install if using Debian/Ubuntu/LinuxMint or any Debian based distro

Apt-fast install instructions youtube video...


This rocks ;) ;p

craigevil 01-17-2010 06:51 PM

Haven't tried it but it looks pretty cool.

http://www.webupd8.org/2009/11/impro...d-upgrade.html

culaterout 01-18-2010 09:54 AM

wow, this will probably become the standard for apt-get


later.... ;)

b0uncer 01-18-2010 10:27 AM

Sounds good, have to admit, but after a first try I found out something odd: having updated package lists and running 'upgrade', it first downloaded the packages, then asked if I wanted to upgrade them. Not much of importance usually, but if for some reason there was a big amount of packages to update and after getting the list I wouldn't want to upgrade them, it would have downloaded the packages already. Could be a problem sometimes...that can be get around by doing a "dry run" before the actual operation, but that's a waste of time and would pretty much make the tool useless.

The idea behind it is good, at least with a fast connection that is charged monthly, not based on amount of downloaded data. Thanks for the link.

craigevil 01-18-2010 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by culaterout (Post 3830945)
wow, this will probably become the standard for apt-get


later.... ;)

Doubtful, wget is well maintained, while axel is buggy.

b0uncer 01-19-2010 02:59 PM

Another funny unimportant piece of information..if there are no updates, it still says

Quote:

Done! Verify that all packages were installed successfully.
Easy task, as no packages were installed :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.