LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 08-09-2006, 10:44 PM   #1
royeo
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 150

Rep: Reputation: 15
I get error message when I try to use ,/configure command


I'm trying to install Firefox. I downloaded the tar.gz file. I untared it using the command tar xvzf firefox-1.5.0.6 and that seemed to work. I'm following directions from a how to at this url: http://www.tuxfiles.org/linuxhelp/softinstall.html. But when I try to use the ./configure command I get the message: bash: ./configure: No such file or directory. I can't proceed until I get past this. I was root at the time.

I have FC-5 and use KDE. I just installed ntfs drivers. If someone can heip me please do.

Thanks,

royeo
 
Old 08-09-2006, 11:00 PM   #2
pddm
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 111

Rep: Reputation: 15
The package for Firefox is a binary package. It does not have to be compiled.
All you have to do is extract it to the place where you want to install it. That's it.

Now, fedora core has probable already a version of firefox installed. you might be better off to upgrade the firefox you have using one of fedora's update utilities or get the latest rpm file from fedoras repository.
 
Old 08-09-2006, 11:24 PM   #3
noranthon
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Distribution: PCLinuxOS with Xfce
Posts: 299

Rep: Reputation: 30
As soon as I get enough time, I'm going to work on Fedora 5. I installed Thunderbird from Mozilla. When I tried to run it, I got the message that libstdc++.so.5 was not found. The advice I was given on another forum was to run
yum provides libstdc++.so.5

I'm not impressed by the way the distros try to restrict users to their own (limited and out of date) repositories.
 
Old 08-10-2006, 12:26 AM   #4
royeo
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 150

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by pddm
The package for Firefox is a binary package. It does not have to be compiled.
All you have to do is extract it to the place where you want to install it. That's it.

Now, fedora core has probable already a version of firefox installed. you might be better off to upgrade the firefox you have using one of fedora's update utilities or get the latest rpm file from fedoras repository.
I did earlier extract it and I couldn't find a starter file. I wrote about it here and was told that a tar.gz file needed to be compiled which includes ,/configure ihg it. Now I don't know what to think. I still don't have an answer to why the ./configure command isn't recognised.

I tried first to just extract it but like I said I couldn't launch it.

Thank you for trying to help.

Roy O'Neill
 
Old 08-10-2006, 03:21 AM   #5
Nylex
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,464

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by royeo
I still don't have an answer to why the ./configure command isn't recognised.
pddm already gave you the answer: there is no configure file because the tarball contains a binary for Firefox. It doesn't require and configuration or compilation, all that has been done already. Tarballs do not have to contain source code that needs to be compiled.

Quote:
I tried first to just extract it but like I said I couldn't launch it.
You need to give details about what you tried and what went wrong.
 
Old 08-10-2006, 04:43 AM   #6
Electro
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Do you have any libstdc++ files. If you have libstdc++.so.6, you could just make a symbolic link to it. Look up the ln command with man or info.

It is ./configure. It is not ,/configure. Your langauge is messing up the syntax. The ./configure command have to run in the firefox directory. Also in order to compile programs you need the devel or header files copied to a certain directory or installed.

BTW, If you do not want to mess with repositories or dependencies, look in to Gentoo. Some people do not like it because they do not have the patience to install on a desktop system. It is tedious but easy to install. It is easy because there are documentations. It is tedious because there are a lot of steps to take.
 
Old 08-10-2006, 08:39 PM   #7
pddm
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 111

Rep: Reputation: 15
Stop it Electro, this is bull!!!

Firefox cannot to be compiled in no way!!!

It is tar.gz sure, but it has no makefile and no configure file!
It comes Precompiled, ready to go, binaries, comprende?

I went through downloading and decompressing it to give royeo an accurate answer.

Royeo, the file to run after decompression is: firefox from the firefox subfolder of wherever you decompressed it to.

Listen to Nylex, he knows.

Have fun

Last edited by pddm; 08-10-2006 at 08:42 PM.
 
Old 08-10-2006, 09:11 PM   #8
oskar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Austria
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.10
Posts: 1,138

Rep: Reputation: 49
Is all that hostility necessary?

Of course you can compile firefox. Download the source code, then compile it. That you don't have to is a different story.

@norathon: If you don't like packages, why do you use Mandriva? They made Gentoo for people like you.

@royeo: That you are trying to compile firefox on FC is puzzling. FC is a RPM based distro. Use FC's package manager to install firefox.

The last time I compiled something was when I still didn't know how to handle a package manager
Linux has the greatest software-managing system of all operating systems imho.
Why wouldn't you want to use it.
 
Old 08-11-2006, 01:01 AM   #9
Electro
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by pddm
Stop it Electro, this is bull!!!

Firefox cannot to be compiled in no way!!!

It is tar.gz sure, but it has no makefile and no configure file!
It comes Precompiled, ready to go, binaries, comprende?

I went through downloading and decompressing it to give royeo an accurate answer.

Royeo, the file to run after decompression is: firefox from the firefox subfolder of wherever you decompressed it to.

Listen to Nylex, he knows.

Have fun
Stop what? Telling the truth or telling lies. The truth is you can compile Firefox. The lie you are telling people that you can not compile Firefox.

A precompiled of Firefox can not be run by just running firefox because it is not in the search path. You have to either type the full path something like /usr/local/firefox/firefox assuming you put it in /usr/local, change directory to /usr/local/firefox and then type ./firefox, or create a symbolic in /usr/bin named firefox that points to the executable file firefox in /usr/local/firefox. A lot of newbies always forget the './'. The ./ means in this directory run the following file.

Gentoo developers provides both a pre-compile version and source code version. I picked the binary version of Firefox while Seamonkey (aka Mozilla) is compiled. Do not tell me that you can not compile Seamonkey because you will then be load of shit.
 
Old 08-11-2006, 03:17 AM   #10
pddm
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 111

Rep: Reputation: 15
We are not talking about Seamonkey.

We are talking about firefox-1.5.0.6.tar.gz.
There is nothing to compile in this file.
It is confusing for newbies.

If You are talking about this file firefox-1.5.0.6-source.tar.bz2
which can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.or...source.tar.bz2
then, yes, you can compile it, of course.

Was this what royeo asked?
 
Old 08-11-2006, 06:16 AM   #11
oskar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Austria
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.10
Posts: 1,138

Rep: Reputation: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by pddm
Stop it Electro, this is bull!!!

Firefox cannot to be compiled in no way!!!
What kind of reaction do you expect from a post like this?
You are insulting him.
And you are wrong.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error message in ./configure during the installation of Rosegarden-4-1.0 King_Loz Linux - Software 5 10-11-2005 07:07 PM
command not found error message dcarlis Linux - Newbie 3 10-21-2004 07:30 PM
Error Message gcc: Command not found Schmurff Fedora 2 09-27-2004 12:23 PM
Error message when doing ./configure geran Linux - Newbie 19 07-24-2004 05:14 AM
Error message when ./configure 'ing quanta madd matt Linux - Software 2 06-18-2004 04:28 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration