LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2011, 11:53 AM   #1
Mission
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
how to determined the best linux os to install?


I'm very graphical person. I have used mandrake before and pretty much liked it. I downloaded the linuxPC os to try it. I haven't installed it yet. I downloaded all five of the ISO's I would assume that they are different flavors of linux? I'm I right or not?

Thank you
Mission
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 06-23-2011, 12:17 PM   #2
rramesh1
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2011
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 1
You could try ubuntu, very stable & ideal for folks using GUI
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-23-2011, 12:37 PM   #3
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753

Rep: Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission View Post
I'm very graphical person. I have used mandrake before and pretty much liked it. I downloaded the linuxPC os to try it. I haven't installed it yet. I downloaded all five of the ISO's I would assume that they are different flavors of linux? I'm I right or not?
I thought that maybe you have dopwnloaded PClinuxOS, but there are more than 5 versions of that distro-

http://www.pclinuxos.com/?page_id=10

Without actually knowing what distro (or disros) you have got its impossible to know, but I would guess that you have downloaded several different versions of one distro. If I'm right, the main difference between the .isos is the desktop enviroment.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-23-2011, 12:50 PM   #4
SalmonEater
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2010
Location: Up the Big River w/o paddle
Distribution: Salent & Slackel
Posts: 131

Rep: Reputation: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission View Post
I'm very graphical person. . . I'm I right or not?
Thank you
Mission
Graphical -- try http://www.pclinuxos.com/?page_id=215

not! different Desktop Environments (DEs) and/or WindowsManagers (WMs) is all -- same distro.

Last edited by SalmonEater; 06-23-2011 at 12:55 PM. Reason: add links
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-23-2011, 12:52 PM   #5
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Welcome to the forums Mission! My advice is try a few Live CDs and install the one you like best. It is a rite of passage.

Make sure you choose a distro with good support and a friendly community. Good luck!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-23-2011, 01:18 PM   #6
dances.with.ugly.women
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Ymir B.C. Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Heres a couple sites that may give you some insite

http://www.lesbell.com.au/Home.nsf/b...c?OpenDocument

Or perhaps you've been here

http://distrowatch.com/
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-23-2011, 03:27 PM   #7
spwnt
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Distribution: Linux Mint/Debian/Arch
Posts: 78

Rep: Reputation: 12
ubuntu is the best newbie distro in my opinion. it has basically an infinite number of packages made for with once you learn how to add new ppa's. it has a huuuuuge wiki with lots of information, and it's, by a landslide, the most commonly used distro.

if you're looking for an ubuntu with lots of packages preinstalled (codecs etc) plus preconfigured to look good, then look into linux mint.
 
Old 06-23-2011, 03:38 PM   #8
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,070

Rep: Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission View Post
I'm very graphical person.
I think, and probably everyone else reading this thread thinks, that you mean that you primarily intend to use a Graphical User interface, rather than wanting a good selection of graphics apps (Gimp, krita, darktable, etc, etc) or that you have a particularly graphic turn of phrase; is that right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission View Post
I have used mandrake before and pretty much liked it. I downloaded the linuxPC os to try it.
PCLos or Mandrake: Mandrake or PCLos?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission View Post
I downloaded all five of the ISO's I would assume that they are different flavors of linux? I'm I right or not?
Probably somewhere between. When people (often, but not exclusively newbies) refer to a 'flavour' they usually mean 'a distro'. Sometimes, they also mean 'variants within a distro'. So a distro is something like Ubuntu/Mepis/Mint/Debian and the variants may be 32 or 64 bit, different GUIs (Gnome/KDE/XFCE/LXDE). Sometimes there are also other variants (server, Long Term Support, premium) too. given all this variation, you can see why the word 'flavour' is a bit ambiguous. (And also the Ubuntu variants get named with a slightly different convention to everything else; for most things you might say 'I've got such-and-such a distro with kde (and you might have several GUIs in one distro); in Ubuntu, the kde variant is called Kubuntu, LXDE Lubuntu, etc, etc...you can still install more than one GUI, but it is unclear whether it has a proper name).

As well as distrowatch referred to earlier, you might enjoy using this distro chooser.
 
Old 06-23-2011, 03:50 PM   #9
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,968

Rep: Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622Reputation: 3622
I find that applications I need and hardware I have play a part in my choice.
 
Old 06-23-2011, 05:31 PM   #10
Mission
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Posts: 6

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
thank you all

Hey wow...that's a lot to chew on...but very helpful. I appreciate everyone's help. I think I will try the Ubuntu version. I installed pclinux os today and set the partion to install it, along with win7 and winXP and using easyBCD but it still does nothing when I choose linux to boot into. My other OS's are good to boot, just not linux. Do I write the MBR in easyBCD or what I'm not sure?

Thank you;
Mission
 
Old 06-23-2011, 06:19 PM   #11
spwnt
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Distribution: Linux Mint/Debian/Arch
Posts: 78

Rep: Reputation: 12
if you install ubuntu it should preconfigure the grub bootloader to be able to boot into windows or ubuntu, or whatever other os's you have installed. it can also auto configure partitions for it to work well with it aswell, though i've only done manual partitioning.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-23-2011, 07:25 PM   #12
kasl33
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Ubuntu-Server, Mac OS X, Arch Linux
Posts: 356

Rep: Reputation: 48
I used PCLinuxOS when it first started out - it was really great. It was based on Mandrake (which is now Mandriva). Both are great, but I wasn't all that happy with the stability - but others are, so that's just me. Ubuntu is a wonderful distribution, based on Debian - which is known to have one of the largest repositories of available software. openSuSE is another great one - I played with it recently and it "just worked" out of the box just as Ubuntu does.

However, I started out with Redhat 9 back in 2003 and since then, I have always preferred command line and configuration files... Meaning I like minimalistic OS's and low overhead (the reason I am using Arch - after multiple failed attempts at running Gentoo).

So... if you were a Windows user, you might be satisfied with Kubuntu - the KDE based Ubuntu distribution. If you were a Mac user, then Ubuntu might suit you with its Gnome desktop.

Good luck in your search! You might consider installing VirtualBox, Virtual PC, or VMware on your existing OS and then, instead of wasting CD's, you can just have the virtualization program mount the .iso's and test them virtually - before you try them on your physical machine.
 
Old 06-23-2011, 07:38 PM   #13
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission
I'm very graphical person.
Two words: Linux Mint. This is the distro I usually recommend to those who don't want to do a whole lot of command-line tinkering (at least at first ). It's basically Ubuntu with preinstalled multimedia codecs and a few other extras that Ubuntu doesn't have for one reason or another (one of those being that the multimedia codecs are patented, and thus have restrictions on redistribution/use).
 
Old 06-23-2011, 07:43 PM   #14
tailinlinux
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Paudpod, Botolan, Zambales, Philippines
Distribution: Mandriva, Ubuntu, Mint, Open Suse, Meego
Posts: 390
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 25
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission View Post
I'm very graphical person. I have used mandrake before and pretty much liked it. I downloaded the linuxPC os to try it. I haven't installed it yet. I downloaded all five of the ISO's I would assume that they are different flavors of linux? I'm I right or not?

Thank you
Mission
Try Mandriva nice desktop, very easy to use etc.
 
Old 06-23-2011, 10:50 PM   #15
yancek
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, PCLinux,
Posts: 10,486

Rep: Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485Reputation: 2485
Quote:
I installed pclinux os today and set the partion to install it, along with win7 and winXP and using easyBCD but it still does nothing when I choose linux to boot into
If you are able to boot your two windows versions and not PCLinuxOS you haven't modified the windows boot files correctly with EasyBCD. If you are going to use EasyBCD, read some of the documentation. Also, if you are using EasyBCD, you should have selected to install the Grub bootloader for PCLinuxOS to the partition on which you installed it.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2.6.33.7 and 2.6.34.7 are not ready? but determined as stable jhladysz Linux - Kernel 8 11-03-2010 03:08 PM
ip information not determined security Red Hat 5 06-05-2010 10:02 AM
How is it determined which modules will be used? tsunami_imcool Linux - Newbie 3 10-23-2007 01:30 PM
what directory is java install? what CMD determined where java is install? Thks. suse2166 Linux - Newbie 2 09-04-2005 08:24 PM
determined to be miserable marshallspaul LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 3 09-13-2004 07:31 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration