Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I'm using Fedora Core 2, which uses GNU GRUB by default as my "boot loader??". I recently updated my kernel from version 2.6.5-1.358 to 2.6.8-1.521. When GRUB displays, the older of the two versions is highlighted by default and is chosed if I dont catch it in time. How can I set the newer version to be the default? Also, can I remove the older entry all together, or is this not a good idea? Thanks in advance!
Edit /boot/grub/menu.lst You should see a line that starts with "default" In mine, it is "default 0" Where the number 0 referes to the first entry in the list of kernel images. Numbering starts with zero, so if you want the default to be the second entry, put "default 1".
If everything is working with your new kernel, there is no problem deleting it from the menu.lst file, or even deleting the kernel image from your system.
Cool. I've edited the menu.lst file and changed default to 0. I also commented out the older kernel entry so only the newest one is shown in the menu.
You mentioned that I could safely delete the old kernel from my system if the new version is running well. It's running very well, in fact. Just one question....how do I go about doing this? I certainly dont want to screw it up! Thanks in advance for your help, guys! You all kick ass!
Well ... you'd want to remove the vmlinuz-file that
corresponds to the old kernel (either lives in / or
/boot) and the corresponding modules. Those are
in /lib/modules/<kernel-version-mumble>, and
rm -rf /lib/modules/<kernel-version-mumble> should
fix that waste of space ;}
You don't have to remove it if you don't want to. It doesn't take up that much space.
If you do want to remove it:
rm -rf 2.6.5-1
You should have the modules for the old kernel somewhere here. The directory will be named after the kernel. I'm assuming that the name is 2.6.5-1. BE CAREFUL! You don't want to delete the modules for the kernel you are using.
You can also remove the old kernel image:
Once again, I am assuming that it is vmlinuz-2.6.5-1. It is the name of the image referenced in your menu.lst.
If you have the old kernel source, you can remove it too:
rm -rf kernel-source-2.6.5-1
I'm assuming the directory is called kernel-source-2.6.5-1
I may be forgetting some things. I use Debian, and to remove a Debian kernel I would just have to type:
dpkg -P kernel-image-2.6.5-1
to purge all the files installed with the old kernel. Unfortunately, Fedora doesn't use dpkg.
It certainly is easier with Debian. BTW, I'm still just playing around with Linux, trying to learn it. I havent decided what distro to go with yet. Do you think Debian is a better distro? One of the reasons why I went with Fedora is because Mandrake 10 wouldnt run on my laptop. At least, no WM would. No video support for my ThinkPad T23. Anyway, is Debian better in your opinion? How is it's hardware support? Fedora installed soooo easily compared to other distros. Thoughts?
What can I say? I had been using Linux (mainly
SuSE) for quite a while before I came across
Slack, but I have learnt more (and faster) in 2
years of Slack than in 4 years of SuSE and
Mandreck :) ... slack is minimalistic, has very
simple basic concepts that are easy to grasp,
and forces you to have full control over the
system by it's utter lack of gadgets. The simplicity
allows you to reasonably easily follow the flow
of control if something goes wrong, there's no
yasts or draks concealing the inner works.
You'll get software installed, it will provide you
with X using VESA, if your NIC is common will
help you set-up a network, set-up sendmail for
local mail delivery, create ssh-keys and then the
As for the adapter: I'm afraid that there's no
freely available accelerated drivers. But if you
don't need to play games with high FPS on the
box VESA should be just fine in any distro :)
I've used Slackware too. I would agree that it forces you to learn things because you have to do lots of configuration by hand. My main reason for using Debian is because of apt and the huge software repository. Slackware has a similar tool called swaret and I'd suggest using it if you install Slackware. Swaret doesn't resolve dependencies or work as fast as apt though.
In addition, if you want an easy introduction to Debian, I highly recommend Libranet. The latest release is a free download now. Libranet gives you a 100% Debian compatible system, but adds some nice tools that make configuration easier (Libranet has "adminmenu" which is somewhat similar to Yast in Suse, or Mandrakes Control Center).