Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i think that seems right.. if you download the latest tar.gz i think its about 25 megs or so. remember, there are some linux on floppy distros out there.. if your worried its too small or something.
Small kernel = good, the smaller it is the faster it is. When you do an install you get a kernel that has everything compiled in or set as modules to cover as many hardware combo's as posible, when you do a custom kernel for your hardware you end up with a much leaner image.
That's a question I wanted to see about. Was wondering what peoples' kernel sizes are and how small they've actually been able to get 'em? I have a 900K right now which is a bit larger than needed but have had it down to 720K. Anyone been able to get a severely small/lean one? 4-500K? Just a curiousity...
The kernel I'm running now on one of my servers is 505k but there is still stuff in there that I don't use so I suppose it could get smaller.
I suppose I could try and see how small I could get it while still letting it function as a full server doing everything it's doing now. It's a 2.2 kernel though. The last 2.4 kernel I compiled was 597k but I only did a quick strip on the main things for that one.
But you can't really compare the size as to how well you've stripped the kernel to the needs of your system. Because each pc has different hardware and will need different parts of the kernel.
I read somewhere that the 2.4 kernel has a 80k database of logical names for the PCI devices. It removes this from memory once the kernel is loaded though. I assume this database has been in older kernels too but it would probably keep increasing. I don't know how much more of these things the kernel has, but you could really make the kernel smaller by removing those kind of things but it won't make your kernel use less memory since it gets removed after booting anyways.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.