LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2002, 05:40 PM   #1
Peingune
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Ill
Distribution: Gentoo x86 2006.0
Posts: 89

Rep: Reputation: 16
Hi linux n00b here, first time post


Hi all, i have a question about linux 2.4.18-3 kernel and 2.4.18-10 kernel :-). I installed linux rh 7.3 about three days ago and things are going fine :-). I learnt how to use rpm, rpm --rebuild -- target, tar, and some other basic things and that is it :-( i wish time would stand still so i can learn more in a single instant :-). Where e-nuff jabber.

1. For the kernel, is the rpm source file better then the regular rpm?
2. In the source kernel file, are there the kernel headers and so on?
3.when upgradeing the kernel from source is it better to use
rpm --rebuild --target athlon ( if you have a athlon system ) instead of, rpm --rebuild --target i686. well from what I've learned
i686 work better for (pentium) and athlon work better for (athlon).
I don't know if what I've learned stand good e-nuff but i hope i'm right :-D.
4.If you have a magically way of upgrading your kernel or have successfully upgraded a kernel from 2.4.18-3 to 2.4.18-10 manully please let me know your secert before I upgrade thank you.

 
Old 10-22-2002, 05:45 PM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
1) in theory, but any general user who says they can tell the difference is a liar though. i'd not recommend bothering with source rpms and stuff, just get tar.gz's from kernel.org

2) headers yes, they are part of the source afterall. so on's... kinda depends what so on's are meant to be.

3) again, just use real source. learn it the proper way.

4) why bother? there's so so so little difference. upgrade to 2.4.19 instead if you have to fiddle with something.
 
Old 10-22-2002, 06:52 PM   #3
Thymox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Plymouth, England.
Distribution: Mostly Debian based systems
Posts: 4,368

Rep: Reputation: 64
Welcome to LQ, Peingune (?).

4. The only difference between those two are the patched applied to them. Pretty much everything is the same! Go for something more challenging!
 
Old 10-22-2002, 11:57 PM   #4
Peingune
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Ill
Distribution: Gentoo x86 2006.0
Posts: 89

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
acid_kewpie
When I said so on, I mean like .c files, things that are not on the system when you do upgrade.
I did the tar.gz and found that more troublesome than the, src.rpm file. But the good thing is you get to pick what you want with the tarball.
Thymox
What do you mean by " Go for something more challenging!
" is there a harder way out there besides kernel-hacking? :-) ( i love that word, can't wait until I'm that good ). Everyday I find linux to be more troublesome but more enjoyable.
I'm never going back to windoze again ( well when I get better at linux I will never go back to windoze hahaha :-) )
good night all

Last edited by Peingune; 10-23-2002 at 12:00 AM.
 
Old 10-23-2002, 04:07 AM   #5
Thymox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Plymouth, England.
Distribution: Mostly Debian based systems
Posts: 4,368

Rep: Reputation: 64
What I meant was that upgrading from .18-3 to .18-10 is a little pointless, unless there is a patch that you need for your hardware to work. If you were simply upgrading your kernel for the sake of upgrading it, then I would advise you to go dor 2.4.19... that's all.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bug- time of post. titanium_geek LQ Suggestions & Feedback 5 07-08-2005 02:24 AM
Long time lurker, second post etrumbo LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 1 04-18-2005 01:04 AM
Post time error? vharishankar LQ Suggestions & Feedback 1 04-10-2005 01:03 PM
n00b installing mandrake 10 for first time roggae Linux - Laptop and Netbook 1 08-29-2004 04:11 PM
ok n00b question of all time The_Drifter Linux - Newbie 10 05-03-2004 02:46 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration