LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-09-2004, 09:47 AM   #1
slackist
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Phuket, Thailand
Distribution: Slackware 13, OS X
Posts: 434

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Help me understand why my Slack is so much easier than other distros


During my brief Linux experience so far I have tried RH9, FC1, Knoppix and Slackware 9.1

As a newbie I choose the default options for each installation with regards to disk partitioning and kernel etc but it seems to me that Slackware is the only distro that just "works".

A small example:

I love the program Celestia. I have installed it on RH9, FC1 and Slackware, on the first two distros I had to ask a lot of questions and ./configure with lots of options to get it to work.

On Slackware it just compiled and installed fine. Also, although I use Gnome as my GUI the Slack compiled version of Celestia uses some sort of KDE window borders/menus etc without a hiccup.

I have read much about Slackware using "Vanilla kernels" and such but I don't really understand what that means.

Is it that all the other stuff in a Slackware install is somehow more carefully compiled to "play nicely" with other things that I install, and if that is true then why wouldn't other distros follow suit ?

Apologies for the rather vague post, and thanks for any links etc that help me get my head around this stuff

mark
 
Old 09-09-2004, 12:34 PM   #2
btmiller
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: In the DC 'burbs
Distribution: Arch, Scientific Linux, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 4,066

Rep: Reputation: 295Reputation: 295Reputation: 295
It's may be because Slack uses Vanilla software, including the kernel. What this means is that other distros add a lot of "enhancements" to the kernels that they ship with their systems (backports from development versions, additions that their people have written, etc.). Same with a lot of the other software. Sometimes this can break things subtly in other applications.

Then again, you simply may have gotten unlucky with your other distros -- I've compiled plenty of stuff on RH etc. with no problems at all.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slack and other Distros: Multi Boot Questions c31c Slackware 5 10-22-2004 05:28 AM
Difference between LFS and distros like Slack and Fedora 741N0 Linux From Scratch 2 09-22-2004 01:53 AM
slack programs in other distros Abe_the_Man Slackware 2 12-11-2003 02:06 AM
Accessing slack partitions from other distros messenjah Linux - Software 6 09-07-2003 03:01 PM
Slack-alike live-cd distros?? Mux Linux - Distributions 2 08-31-2002 11:52 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration