"GRUB _" when booting, nothing but "ctrl+alt+del" functions
i have 3 hard drives. 2 sata and 1 ide.
i dont have the exact specs, but drive c: was the 40gb ide, drive d: was 120gb sata and e: was 160gb sata. i was running primarily on the d: drive. originally (don't ask me why) i had a diff installation of xp on each. i decided i'd like to give linux a try (and also was tired of spyware/malware that i couldnt seem to remove). so i used the computer management thing to format my e: drive, and it said it worked fine. after that though, it couldnt seem to find the c: drive (not really the problem now). so i backed up my files on d: over to e: (i figured it was ok to not have an os on it if i just used it for storage - true?). then i booted from my linux cd (redhat). the instal said it worked fine, i assumed it did. but now, when i boot up without a disk, it goes through the boot sequence of my 2 cd-rom drives, then says "GRUB _" with the flashing underscore. nothing on my keyboard does anything except ctrl+alt+del. i tried the rescue to put the boot loader on the mbr, same result. so i tried it again with the other option (i think the first section of the boot partition), same result. so i decided to just go back to windows, only now when i boot from that install disk, it says 'detecting hardware configuration' and then goes blank and nothing else. i have a knoppix live cd, and it works, so i can get online if necessary, but i cant access any of my hard drives or the os on them. (if this belongs in the general section, i'm sorry. i just figured it was more technical than microsoft-related) |
Hi, and welcome to LQ!
To help you with this we need to find out in which order FC saw the drives during install, where it installed Grub to, and what drive Linux is on now. From Knoppix (in the hope that Knoppix sees the drives in the same way FC did): what does fdisk -l show you, can you, from that output, tell which is your linux instal, which is the working XP and which holds the data? Cheers, Tink |
Quote:
the interesting thing to me is in the computer management/disk management thing. this is what shows up Disk0 C:\ Healthy (System) Disk1 __ 102 mb Healthy (Active) no drive letter [i'm assuming this is where GRUB should be?] [this box also has diaganol lines through it] Disk1 (still) G:\ 111.69 gb Healthy Disk2 D:\ 149.05 gb NTFS Healthy (Active) i dont really know what all that means, but i think my assumptions are at least close. i'm gonna leave knoppix running (please tell me if that's a bad idea. as far as the order that the install showed the drives, i'm 90% sure it showed my 120 gb as sda and my 160 gb as sdb. and although it makes no sense to me, it didnt show my ide drive at all. for future help/instructions, could you dumb down the linux-related lingo so i know i'm doing things correctly? also, as a last resort, would i be able to back up my files onto my roommates computer using knoppix? and is it possible for knoppix to use my wireless network? i've had to use the 'nodhcp' code so it doesnt hang on eth0 when loading. i configure eth1 for my cat5 cable to get online here, and i'm not sure what eth2 is. anyway, if i can fix this instal, just ignore these questions. thank you |
Quote:
Disk /dev/hdb: 40.0 GB, 40060403712 bytes 240 heads, 63 sectors/track, 5174 cylinders Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 = 7741440 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdb1 * 1 5173 39107848+ 7 HPFS/NTFS Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux /dev/sda2 14 14593 117113850 8e Linux LVM Disk /dev/sdb: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 * 1 19457 156288321 7 HPFS/NTFS i think that means i was wrong about it not seeing my ide drive, eh? or maybe just knoppix sees it but not the linux install? either way, does that help? i tried to space it all out, but it didnt work, sorry. |
You could use [ code ] [ /code ] (without the spaces) between the words
and the [ ] to get proper spacing. That said: it really depends on what FC saw during install, and where it installed grub to. Chances are that Knoppix will see your wireless card, just try it. Cheers, Tink Cheers, Tink |
Quote:
i'd at least like to know how to get it too boot from my windows cd... do you know why it wont? it doesnt sound like something that's supposed to happen. like something is actually messed up and not just a mistake i made, you kow? (it just stops after detecting hardware configuration and doesnt let me do anything like recovery console or a new instal) |
I wouldn't go trying that. I suggest you use the FC install CD
as a rescue-disk. Once you're in, grab the same info (fdisk -l). If it displays the same things, make sure to run grub-install /dev/hdb What's hda, btw, do you have a CD-ROM as the primary master on your IDE controller? The problem may well be caused by your BIOS, if you -for instance- force the slave to master via BIOS, Grub may get confused. Cheers, Tink |
Quote:
|
Quote:
about the master/slave, this kinda confuses me. according to my bios, i don't have anything set as primary master or primary slave. my dvd drive is secondary master and my cd drive is secondary slave. bios is another thing i'm not that familiar with. i tried the autodetect, and it detected nothing. i'm gonna take a guess and say that's (at least part of) why linux doesn't find my ide drive. also, the boot to windows i managed last night was apparently a one time thing. i couldn't do it just now. it did the whole "GRUB _" thing again. should i try to do that command on hdb anyway? thanks |
Some thoughts; hopefully won't add confusion:
- I recall reading somewhere FC didn't install to SATA disks properly - hdb is fine, just means it's not the primary on the cable. - I'm surprised Windoze booted at all - the reason the Windoze CD won't boot is because of the boot flags on the SATA disk. Yes I know 'doze is installed on a different disk; I've seen this before. Yes, it' stoopid, but we are talking M$oft here. However the Fedora install shouldn't set that flag either - just as inane. Mmmm - just saw that last post. Personally I'd give up on Fedora if it's causing that much grief. I'd recommend Ubuntu, but I don't want to start a "Distro war". Pick another distro and install it smack over the top of your FC install - all your issues should disappear. This all seems a shortcoming in Fedora rather than anything you've screwed up. If you'd like to go back to XP (normal) booting and calm down for a while before embarking again on Linux, ask here and we'll get that sorted as well. Edit: removed junk at end of post. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sorry I got side-tracked and never got back to this.
Simplest (quickest) solution is to remove the 120 Gig drive to allow the XP CD to boot. Simply pull a cable out; power or interface cable, either at the drive or the motherboard - doesn't matter. Then boot the XP, get into "recovery console" (hit the "R" key during the boot I think), then run "fixmbr" (no quotes). Reboot - when happy it works, connect the 120 Gig again. Won't affect subsequent reboots off the hard-disk. The other option is to boot Knoppix, get the root console open, and type "fdisk /dev/sda" - as it says, "m" gives you the (sub) commands. Always handy to do "p" for reference - then "a", then the partition number - in your case "1". Then "w" to update the disk,and "q" to quit. Reboot. You can (also) do this after you get XP back if you want - handy to have a spare disk to play with and get the experience. It is possible it (the XP CD) still won't boot because of the bootflag on the 160 Gig drive, but if it sees a valid Windows install there it should proceed - that is a valid (multi-system) environment, even for M$osft. In need, repeat the Knoppix actions above for /dev/sdb. |
Quote:
|
The MBR simply points to where ntldr lives - doesn't give a rat's arse about anything else.
Same should apply to the "installer", but appears not to (from experience) - but I'm not going to try and rationalize the thinking behind it. The new disk will be seen but ignored by XP as it's not a M$oft partition type - it might offer to reformat it for you. I always reply "no" - especially if I plan to use it for Linux in the future. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM. |