LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2013, 08:30 AM   #1
Altiris
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Posts: 555

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
GNOME 3 vs Unity - Performance


So I'm planning on installing a linux version on my HP dv6t 2011 laptop. It has good specs, core i3, ATI 5750 etc. So far I have in thought, Ubuntu, openSUSE, Debain, and Fedora. However, considering Ubuntu 13.04 sort of tweaked unity more and made it less demanding, is unity now "lighter" than GNOME 3 (the version that Debain and Fedora use or is ubuntu still the heavy one?)
 
Old 05-18-2013, 09:35 AM   #2
TroN-0074
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: OpenSUSE 13.2 64bit-Gnome on ASUS U52F
Posts: 1,444

Rep: Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340
your computer with i3 processor will handle Unity just fine, and it will handle Gnome just fine too, so why worry about them being 'lighter'. It should come down to what you prefer the most.

You have mentioned in other post that you despised LXDE and Xfce, with that in mind remember that if you like a prettier GUI they will use more resources than the ligther one. But again with your computer you wont even notice any different in performance.

My Gateway pentium 4 1 GB ram, runs Gnome 3.4 just fine. my thinkpad t43 runs slackware with KDE 4.10 good enough too, just all the effects disabled.

Good luck to you man
 
Old 05-18-2013, 12:00 PM   #3
mreff555
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Philly
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 473

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
As TroN-0074 said, and i3 will run both adequately. If you are interested in performance I wouldn't consider either. If I had to choose between the two I suppose I would pick Unity.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 03:53 PM   #4
Altiris
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Posts: 555

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Oh okay, I'll go with unity then. I don't dislike LXDE and Xubutu but rather the way they look by default. I love the way they look in Lubuntu and Xubuntu but otherwise, ehhh. I honestly don't know what the GNOME team were thinking of when they released gnome 3, I like the idea and its cool but its just too much of a hassle if u have a lot of windows open
 
Old 05-18-2013, 03:57 PM   #5
mreff555
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Philly
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 473

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I can only assume they were looking to jump in to the tablet market. That's about the only application I could imagine where Gnome 3 would make sense.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 04:26 PM   #6
Altiris
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Posts: 555

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Edit: damn, one thing I'm getting annoyed right now is that there are so many varieties to pick from and really each of them are all good to use, it's so hard to chose. My thoughts are:

Ubuntu - Unity
Kubuntu - KDE (I don't like Xubuntu or Lubuntu because their sleep mode GUis look horrible)
Fedora 18 - KDE (I don't like GNOME 3, it's cool and all but it's not practical)
OpenSUSE - KDE ( has batter saving options, like fedora)

The reason why I may want to go for Ubuntu is because it has support for all programs I nesd like Steam and Spotify but then the fact that unity might affect FPS ingame and that there aren't really any power saving options. Kubuntu is the same but minus it affecting FPS ingame. Fedora and Opensuse are the ones that have good battery/power settings but they don't hve official releases in .rpm for Steam and Spotify. I don't think Unity affects FPS too much does it?

Last edited by Altiris; 05-18-2013 at 05:12 PM.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 05:22 PM   #7
mreff555
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Philly
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 473

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Everyone has their own opinions, which is why linux is great because you can pick the perfect operating system for you.

In my case, I like many of the sparse, do it yourself systems eg. Gentoo and Slack. However for my laptop I prefer a nice stable, easy to maintain system. I value speed and simplicity above all else so for me the best option is Crunchbang.

It is Debian based, and uses the synaptic package manager, much like ubuntu. However it uses an extremely light and fast WM called Openbox. Nobody likes it the first time they use it, however configure it to your liking, give it two weeks and you will be hooked and despise every other window manager. It's just that cool!

Last edited by mreff555; 05-18-2013 at 05:26 PM.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 06:47 PM   #8
TroN-0074
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: OpenSUSE 13.2 64bit-Gnome on ASUS U52F
Posts: 1,444

Rep: Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340
Go with OpenSUSE + KDE they have all software just like in Ubuntu and their YaST tool is really handy
 
Old 05-18-2013, 07:35 PM   #9
Altiris
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2013
Posts: 555

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
For some reason Opensuse won't boot up from my USB, I use netbootinstall or something and it works for all distros except for openSUSE for some reason. I've tried Fedora KDE so far and it's pretty good but I think I enjoy Slackware.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 09:40 PM   #10
cortman
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Distribution: Crunchbang 11, LFS 7.3, DSL 4.1.10, Lubuntu 12.10, Debian 7
Posts: 219

Rep: Reputation: 43
If you're going to use Unity, make sure you understand the ramifactions referred to in my signature.
I like Gnome shell a lot myself, personally.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 10:17 PM   #11
TroN-0074
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: OpenSUSE 13.2 64bit-Gnome on ASUS U52F
Posts: 1,444

Rep: Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340
The thing with OpenSUSE is that takes long to boot. Atleast that is what has happened to me in the pass, but if you allow it time it would boot.

Unless you have a error message of some kind.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 10:29 PM   #12
haertig
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, LinuxMint, Slackware, SysrescueCD
Posts: 2,138

Rep: Reputation: 334Reputation: 334Reputation: 334Reputation: 334
You really can't say things like Gnome, Unity, KDE, etc. in the same sentence with "light". However, if you throw enough hardware at them, similar to what Windows requires of its users, they do just fine. So pick what you like. My choice is the opposite of yours - Xfce - because I work mostly from the command line and prefer not to have all the bling-bling of the "more full featured" desktops. The cool thing about Linux, is you have the operating system, and then you have the desktop. You can mix and match them to your personal liking.

Last edited by haertig; 05-18-2013 at 10:30 PM.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 10:51 PM   #13
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636
It amazes me that people think Unity and Gnome 3 are different things, they aren't. Unity and Gnome-Shell are different but both have Gnome 3 underneath and both are merely "shells" on top of Gnome 3.
 
Old 05-18-2013, 11:46 PM   #14
TroN-0074
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Michigan USA
Distribution: OpenSUSE 13.2 64bit-Gnome on ASUS U52F
Posts: 1,444

Rep: Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340Reputation: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01 View Post
It amazes me that people think Unity and Gnome 3 are different things, they aren't. Unity and Gnome-Shell are different but both have Gnome 3 underneath and both are merely "shells" on top of Gnome 3.
Up to this point it is the same thing but that is about to change with Unity migrating to QT and also migrating from X11 to MIR. I think Canonical target is 14.04 to be completed and changed.

However I think OP already has made his mind about this subject.

Last edited by TroN-0074; 05-19-2013 at 07:54 AM.
 
Old 05-19-2013, 02:30 AM   #15
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636Reputation: 636
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroN-0074 View Post
Up to this point it is the same thing but that is about to change with Unity migrating to QT and also migrating from X11 to MIR. I think Canonical target is 14.04 to be completed and changed.
I'll believe it when I see it. Not all that long ago Ubuntu was going to migrate to Wayland and now they have changed their mind. I take half of what comes from Canonical with a pinch of salt and the other half is usually just dreamtime stuff.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TroN-0074 View Post
However I think OP already has made his made about this subject.
A made(I assume this is supposed to be "point") based on incorrect knowledge.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Unity 6.8 Doesn't Change Much For Performance LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-07-2012 10:12 AM
LXer: Unity 6.6: Still Regressing On Performance? LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-29-2012 07:30 PM
LXer: Gaming/Graphics Performance On Unity, GNOME, KDE, Xfce LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-08-2012 04:00 PM
LXer: Intel SNA With Unity, Unity 2D & GNOME Shell LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-11-2011 06:40 AM
LXer: How Unity, Compiz, GNOME Shell & KWin Affect Performance LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-30-2011 11:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration