LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 04-10-2008, 08:12 PM   #1
sajro
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Tennessee
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Ubuntu, Puppy
Posts: 39

Rep: Reputation: 15
Gentoo, Arch, or Slackware: which for speed and stability on a general use laptop?


Hello LQ'ers,

I'm putting Linux on my laptop and I'm concerned about speed. This laptop will be turning on and off quite frequently (school) and these custom, KISS distros are faster and slimmer than, say, Ubuntu, Debian, or openSuSE.

I'm really leaning toward Gentoo. I don't mind tinkering to get everything working (as long as I remember to image it in case it fails) and my application set is pretty static, so it would have a massive initial compile time, then it would be pretty rare adding another application. My concern with Gentoo is using the few non-free applications I need: Flash, Java, mp3 codecs, et cetera (which, once adequately matured, will be replaced with Gnash/swfdec, IcedTea, ogg when I get a Rockbox/Vorbis-compatible player, etc.). Are these as easy to get as in binary-based distros?

Any reason I should pick Arch or Slackware (or even a bloated one, like Debian (I'd use Dreamlinux) or openSuSE, etc.) over Gentoo? (No Sabayon, don't want pre-built and don't want Compiz leaving artifact files after un-installation.)

My system is as such: I press power, and (in preferably less than 45 seconds) I am presented with a SLiM prompt. After I log in, it transports me to a Fluxbox desktop with Conky, a calendar app (probably Rainlendar, if I can't find an open-source app what I need; simply a calendar with a basic to-do list functionality, not a full GTD suite), and a few tray apps.
 
Old 04-10-2008, 08:42 PM   #2
hoodooman
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Stirling in Scotland
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 64 bit
Posts: 297

Rep: Reputation: 42
Hi Sajro.Having used Gentoo,Arch and Slackware I have found no noticable difference between them in terms of speed.I have stuck with Slackware because the initial install is quick and then I compile all the apps I use from source.You will have to install the codecs etc that you need manually or by using a Slackbuild.To finish all I can say is ive used Slackware for over five years and found it to be good reliable stuff.Hope you find what you need I know other users will have their favorites so listen to their arguments too.

Last edited by hoodooman; 04-10-2008 at 08:45 PM.
 
Old 04-10-2008, 08:44 PM   #3
chilebiker
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Lake District, Chile
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 17
From what I've read from ex-Gentooers on the Arch forum, Arch is as fast as Gentoo. I'd go for Arch.
 
Old 04-10-2008, 09:41 PM   #4
mcmillan
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 489

Rep: Reputation: 30
I haven't had problems with stability with Arch, though it can actually be easier to keep it working with frequent updates, rather than the occasional big update. That way if something does break it's easier to track down what needs to be done for fixing it when you know exactly what update broke things and news posts are little fresher.

If you want to have a system you can setup and forget about slackware might be a little more what you're looking for.

I never ran gentoo, compiling everything just didn't seem worth it hearing the same thing chilebiker said, though I am a little curious to try it out sometime, maybe if I get my 2nd desktop working again as a test system. But between arch and slackware I didn't notice a whole lot of difference in speed, arch might have booted a bit faster but the response of an already up system seemed wasn't significant to stand out.
 
Old 04-11-2008, 05:46 AM   #5
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266Reputation: 1266
If you want stability, I say Slackware. Speed is generally very similar between the three you mentioned, but you could probably squeeze out a few extra drops of performance with Gentoo, at the cost of many hours of compile time.

If you want extra performance is Slackware, you should recompile the kernel.
 
Old 04-11-2008, 08:15 AM   #6
premnarayan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: noida
Distribution: archlinux, slackware
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: 15
Arch is my choice. Its fast and easily customizable. I can get my desktop to present a login prompt in less than 15 sec (I have my customizations, including kernel!). Its based on slackware and has a very good package management system. Occasionally you just have to run a simple command to get all your system updated.
 
Old 04-11-2008, 08:26 AM   #7
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
I am having very good luck so far with Arch on an HP Compaq 8510. The only issue so far is getting the network profiles to work. I'm about to post a thread on this specific issue.

I appreciate the philosophy of Slackware and I have done several installations. Arch, however, is friendlier.

Quote:
Originally Posted by premnarayan
Its based on slackware...
That's a new one...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speed: Basic Debian + fluxbox, or Arch? s26c.sayan Linux - Distributions 4 03-01-2007 01:20 AM
Arch vs. Gentoo? /hme/usr Linux - Distributions 7 12-20-2005 05:52 PM
Slackware, Gentoo, speed shashir Slackware 30 09-22-2005 10:54 AM
konqueror vs firefox in download speed, stability and compatibility ungua Linux - Software 4 05-15-2005 04:26 AM
Speed, stability, and no Darth Gates telling me what to do. Cataract2 Linux - General 1 03-16-2003 04:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration