Lets get this right: you want me to debug someone's web page... I normally expect to be paid for that sort of thing! Oh well... nothing ventured:
Just me looking: Note - no IE gets anyplace close to my machine!
1. It needs javascript or
nothing is displayed. This is very bad practise. The page needs to be readable with a non-java browser.
2. Even with javascript I see there is no text on the page at all.
3. There is no title defined.
4. Scrollbars are disabled
Looking at the source I see scrolling="no" on all frames. It makes extensive use of frames, which is discouraged by W3C.
5. The next link is to a page written in black on a black background
6. Finally
found a page with text.
6.1. There are non-utf8 characters used for display
6.2. Yup - the text is boldface.
6.3. despite saying it is "English", there is no English text on the page
Looking at source: it uses iframes - very bad habit!
Need to look at the embedded pages and the CSS to get to the character stuff though.
What does
W3C think?
7 issues with validation. Mostly unencoded ampersands stopping "vitrine" being properly accessed. And you put a frame border ="no" instead of "0".
Confirms - the issue is in the embedded page or css.
The embedded page is
[html]
<LINK REL=STYLESHEET TYPE="text/css" HREF="vitrine.css">
</head>
<body background="bg_blauw_text.gif" bgcolor="#300060" class="bl">
<h4>Voor het versieren... ...door elkaar.</h4><br>
</body>
</html>
[/html]
There are h4 tags around the entire text. According to the specification, h4 is boldface. I take it this is the errant bold text?
Note: The javascript can be replaced by CSS for the picture links. You don't need the iframes at all. You only want the frames so you can keep a picture at the top... you can use div elements for that. Though there is an advantage in terms of displaying seperate content pages.
That will cost you US$100.00 + tax. Where shall I send the invoice?
