LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-24-2003, 07:06 AM   #1
charles_mingus
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Espaņa
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
First Linux try: Dual Boot Linux-XP


For months I have had an empty partition on my machine that is reserved for a Linux distro "when I get around to it", but due to laziness and fear of change, I never have gotten around to it.

However, I've always admired the open source ethos and so I recently installed Mozilla 1.4 (I no longer use IE) and I am amazed at how much better it is than Microsoft' browser. Then, after reading about the Microsoft DRM patch (at slashdot), I decided that I should start getting my feet wet in the Linux world that Microsoft is inevitably steering me toward with their lack of ethics and imagination.

But I am cautious about change, especially since I need my computer for work, so I'd like to start with a dual boot until I get to know Linux well enough to flush Microsoft out of my life.

Right Now I have 2 hds on my Pentium 4 2 ghz machine (512 mb ram):

hd0 is an 80 gb Maxtor
hd1 is a 40 gb Seagate

Hd0 has 4 partitions on it:

F: Windows XP (NTFS 13 gb - Primary)
G: Programs (14 gb FAT 32 - Logical)
H: Data 1 (49 gb FAT 32 - Logical)
I: Data 2 (40 gb FAT 32 - Logical)

Hd1 has 1 partition:

C: Data (40 gb FAT 32 - Primary)

*Note: hd1 is older and although it is the slave, it still retains the C: label. D: and E: are CD and DVD, leaving F: etal. for the partitions on the newer master, hd0.

The two candidates for the Linux installation are C: and I:


C: has only 12 gb of free space, but it is a separate hd and already set to primary. I was thinking I could copy all of that data over to hd0 and just use that hd for Linux, but I want to have some of that 40 gb available for Windows data storage as well.

I: has 29 gb free, and I can clear out the data that is stored on it, or make smaller partitions. This hd is also runs at a higher rpm than the other, so maybe it is better for operating systems.

_____________________

I also have to decide between Suse 8.2 or Redhat 9.0. I have read that maybe Suse is better for a Linux newbie like myself, but I'm open to that debate.

So any Linux guru feel like holding a newbie's hand through his first install? I promise I'll pay close attention to your instructions.

By the way, I live in Spain where some of the Autonomous communities (Extremadura, for example) have started developing Linux based systems for local government admistration and I'm hoping I can help spread the Linux message here once I'm up and running (I'm already doing so with Mozilla)...

Un saludo.

Last edited by charles_mingus; 09-24-2003 at 07:09 AM.
 
Old 09-24-2003, 08:41 AM   #2
guygriffiths
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Reading, UK
Distribution: Debian 3.0, LFS
Posts: 524

Rep: Reputation: 37
Firstly, it doesn't really matter which hard drive you use, it's up to you. I'd probably go for the C: drive, although it's a bit slower and will take more time to clear out, simply because it's physically separate and if anything goes drastically wrong you can just format the whole thing without worrying about deleting some of your existing data. It's more of a security thing (i.e. making you feel more secure) than a practical reason.
If the I: drive is a lot faster you should probably use that though.

Anyway, I've never used SuSe, but I've used Redhat 8, and that was pretty simple to install. It boots from CDROM and leads you through the install pretty well. It sets up almost everything very nicely, and I didn't find I needed to do much tweaking to it. Any tweaking I did need to do I found on the internet pretty much straight away.

Well done on going to Mozilla, it's an amazing piece of software. Good luck with whatever you choose to do.
Guy
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
hOw to dual boot linux suse with a dual boot win98/xp pc walterkai SUSE / openSUSE 1 12-14-2004 06:04 PM
installing redhat linux 9.1 in dual boot mode(actually 98,xp,linux together) linuxchub Linux - Newbie 1 09-16-2004 11:21 AM
dual boot - XP and Linux - Need to reinstall XP without effecting linux -LILO boot godofmind Linux - General 1 05-05-2004 09:13 AM
Linux & Windows 98SE dual boot... will defrag mess up linux partition? herrtool Linux - General 5 10-31-2003 03:43 PM
Linux Boot Floppy Went Bad on W2K-Linux Dual Boot rzward Linux - General 2 01-15-2003 11:52 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration