Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I thought that could be the case - hence my man page suggestion. But try
find . -perm +u=w
Deprecated, old way of searching for files with any of the permission bits in mode set. You
should use -perm /mode instead. Trying to use the '+' syntax with symbolic modes will yield
surprising results. For example, '+u+x' is a valid symbolic mode (equivalent to +u,+x, i.e.
0111) and will therefore not be evaluated as -perm +mode but instead as the exact mode speci-
fier -perm mode and so it matches files with exact permissions 0111 instead of files with any
execute bit set. If you found this paragraph confusing, you're not alone - just use -perm
/mode. This form of the -perm test is deprecated because the POSIX specification requires the
interpretation of a leading '+' as being part of a symbolic mode, and so we switched to using
Last edited by billymayday; 11-24-2008 at 01:30 AM.