LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-27-2007, 05:47 PM   #16
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738

The dialog has been along the lines of "If you want the installed package to WORK." How does it help to force it and then discover it does not work?

You still really have only 2 choices:
Use the package manager and the repositories
Hunt down and install the dependencies

Just to be difficult, I'll offer another option: use the Debian family and apt/synaptic. I believe the repositories have more stuff and the package management system is better. YMMV
 
Old 02-27-2007, 06:06 PM   #17
custangro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: California
Distribution: Fedora , CentOS , RHEL
Posts: 1,970
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 208Reputation: 208Reputation: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany
The dialog has been along the lines of "If you want the installed package to WORK." How does it help to force it and then discover it does not work?
...sorry...I was answering "Can anybody explain how to solve them with RPM ?" question since he seems so determined to NOT use YUM....

I was just offering another choice in the matter...sorry

Last edited by custangro; 02-27-2007 at 06:08 PM.
 
Old 02-27-2007, 10:50 PM   #18
Junior Hacker
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: North America
Distribution: Debian testing Mandriva Ubuntu
Posts: 2,687

Rep: Reputation: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany
Just to be difficult, I'll offer another option: use the Debian family and apt/synaptic. I believe the repositories have more stuff and the package management system is better. YMMV
I agree to a point, the other day I booted up an old installation of Woody that had been upgraded to Sarge, it had'nt been booted up in 435 days so I went to fetch updates and applied them. All hell broke loose and I was left with CLI that could'nt do nothing but produce errors. More than likely because of some of the original Woody packages that are so far out of date. I have on that computer Mandrake 10.1 also, to this day urpmi has never produced errors on Mandrake 10, 10.1, or 10.2. It does not try to apply packages from a newer distribution like synaptic did to my Sarge. The analogy there appears to be that if you want a newer version of a package on an old distro, you take your chances with source install, you won't get it from Mandrake after support/upgrades come to a halt. When I upgraded my Woody to Sarge, Sarge was classified as "testing", now it is stable, it appeared synaptic tried to apply Etch "testing" packages to my Sarge with allot of Woody base packages. Packages from three distributions. So I had to put Woody/Sarge to rest and got Etch

EDIT: It could be the repositories I had in that old installation that had "testing" in them that caused the problems when doing updates, where as with Mandrake, the only repositories one would generally include are distribution specific.

Last edited by Junior Hacker; 02-27-2007 at 11:13 PM.
 
Old 02-28-2007, 01:51 PM   #19
Zooty
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Reading, UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 6
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Fedora Yum problems..

Bill et al,

Thank you for the pointers in the right direction. There is quite a bit for me to take in. I must admit that I wasn't aware how precisely Yum worked deep down inside, especially with respect to the RPMs. I have removed Firefox and many other programs (note to Junior Hacker, I am trying to update the entire system). I will now begin the process of reinstalling everything, starting from the latest dependencies.

From what I have gathered on my system, the problem seems to stem from the library 'libsvrg2.i386' which gets automatically installed on x86_64 systems and is virtually impossible to remove.

Is this a bug in the FC6 distribution?

Regards,

Zooty
 
Old 02-28-2007, 06:54 PM   #20
Junior Hacker
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: North America
Distribution: Debian testing Mandriva Ubuntu
Posts: 2,687

Rep: Reputation: 61
Probably more like a "built in" bug.

The Red Hat name is well renowned in an office setting with many computers/servers. I feel they adopted Mandriva's strategy by offering two or more versions of their system. If you ran a business with many computers, you would not have the time to deal with this. If Fedora worked like a charm and did not waste your time, would you spend money on Red Hat Enterprise?. Or would you be more likely to put the free Fedora in your systems?.
 
Old 03-01-2007, 12:14 PM   #21
Zooty
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Reading, UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 6
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Exclamation Fedora Core 6 (x86_64) problem...

Well, in that case can anyone recommend a good distribution to install on my x86_64 machine? I know that this request may open a can of worms in the linux community ;-) Ideally I'd like one that can help me do development work, shell scripting, etc (and has good hardware detection, too!).

I have heard of other OS's (e.g. PC-BSD and MEPIS), but I'm not sure whether they are compatible with other linux-based operating systems.

Any thoughts?

Zooty
 
Old 03-01-2007, 12:42 PM   #22
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738Reputation: 738
PC-BSD is (I assume) BSD---A Unix flavor

Mepis is Linux...based on Ubuntu which is based on Debian (Mepis is my personal favorite)

Take a look here: http://distrowatch.com
 
Old 03-04-2007, 10:22 AM   #23
Zooty
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Reading, UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 6
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Talking

Thanks!

Zooty
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
failed dependencies koodoo Linux - Newbie 8 03-08-2005 02:14 PM
Failed Dependencies????? igo_mexico Linux - Newbie 2 09-03-2004 08:22 PM
I recieve a failed dependencies error, but I have all required dependencies Laptop2250 Linux - Software 15 02-03-2004 08:58 PM
Failed Dependencies - Why? leroy27336 General 7 11-18-2003 04:15 PM
failed dependencies jaylee Linux - General 4 06-25-2003 06:45 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration